CaliforniaKid wrote:Uncharitable and strident Sam may be, but he deserves real credit for being a persuasive, incisive, and entertaining writer. At the end of the day, it's hard not to agree with him.
Funny, I've always found it incredibly easy to disagree with him. I guess I'm just too stupid.
CaliforniaKid wrote:Uncharitable and strident Sam may be, but he deserves real credit for being a persuasive, incisive, and entertaining writer. At the end of the day, it's hard not to agree with him.
Funny, I've always found it incredibly easy to disagree with him. I guess I'm just too stupid.
Aristotle,
Though you and I have come to different conclusions regarding the existence of God and other weighty topics, I've always enjoyed reading your posts. You seem to be fair-minded and even-keeled and not prone to nastiness.
I always find that I learn more from a critic than a fan for any particular subject, so I'd like to ask you this: As someone who agrees with Sam Harris on an awful lot of his published conclusions, I would like to know what would be the top two or three things you find yourself in disagreement with him?
Thanks!
eschew obfuscation
"I'll let you believers in on a little secret: not only is the LDS church not really true, it's obviously not true." -Sethbag