And that is what's so incredible. I do speak far, far too much, which means my enemies have plenty arguments for them to try refuting.
But they don't.
There are a couple of possibilities here, both of which imply deep psychopathology. But, moving right along...
Ever.
You losing arguments long ago became the gold standard of your participation. Go back to those long threads at the MADboard on the KEP in the old pundits forum. Just take a look at all of the times, both there and here, you had to be told, over and over and over again, in only slightly different phraseology, that "You don't know what you're talking about."
How many reiterations, I wonder, are necessary?
Because they're not really interested in truth.
I think this is the kind of thing that gets Pahoran and folks like me, with a bit less tolerance for unbelievably narcissistic displays of bad faith of this kind, in the mood for some personal jousting. Contra Kevin's delusional and self serving protestations, this kind of thing represents, in one form or another, the vast majority of what Kevin has ever posted. Not that the vast majority of his actual text is this kind of character attack, but that the vast majority of the text is peppered liberally throughout with exactly this kind of thing. Its pervasive and it dominates all discussions with him. It frequently gets a rise out of people.
I wonder why that might be?
Every once in a while Dan will get excited when he thinks I made a big mistake, and he'll start to pound on it to discredit me. (This, despite his regular insistence that he refuses to discuss anything with me)
I wonder why that might be?