You bet, Chap. Buffalo likes to point out as many instances as possible when God has not met his idea of justice - and other things. One is left to wonder how Buffalo has arrived at his idea of justice.
Still not clear. To simplify things, this is the post we want cleared up
Buffalo wrote:
It would be nice if God would have protected all those innocent people 10 years ago. Then he wouldn't have had to go through the trouble of comforting us.
Hoop replied
Innocent of what?
The 9/11 victims are considered "innocent victims" by most everyone in this country. You appear to question their innocence. Why?
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die." - Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
You bet, Chap. Buffalo likes to point out as many instances as possible when God has not met his idea of justice - and other things. One is left to wonder how Buffalo has arrived at his idea of justice.
You are still quite unclear to me. Let me try again to grasp what you are driving at.
By asking your question "Innocent of what?", were you trying to raise the question "Where do you get the moral standard by which you judge these people to be innocent if you do not have a belief in a God who defines a moral standard?"
Zadok: I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis. Maksutov: That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Pretty mild really. Where's that fat idiot Jerry Falwell to call us to task for not killing the homosexuals and the Muslims and the socialites and other undesirables, the main reason for 9/11?*
*May be factually inaccurate hyperbole.
Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded.-charity 3/7/07
MASH quotes I peeked in the back [of the Bible] Frank, the Devil did it. I avoid church religiously. This isn't one of my sermons, I expect you to listen.
café crema wrote:Monsons OpEd piece in the Washington Post is nothing like what I've seen from my local churches you can read it here:
I'm a little surprised by the generic quality of the piece. There isn't a hint of Mormonism in it. A Mormon reading it will find it totally familiar, reflecting the Book of Mormon teachings and the constant periods of faith and falling from faith, but a nonMormon will find nothing informative about Mormonism. It seems carefully designed to do exactly that, in fact, INHO.
That's my take as well. It's very empty.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
You know, as a parent, I can really relate to this piece.
Whenever I feel that my kids aren't worshipping me enough, I do something drastic like light their room on fire, or make them watch me run over their favorite toy with my car, or if they just aren't being receptive, maybe I'll withhold food and water for a few days until they are forced to turn to me for help! Then I make them worship me all the harder before I give them food. It's all out of my exceeding love for them!!
I can totally understand why God would need to send thousands of people to a gruesome and painful death in order to get all of us slackers to worship Him more. And, by golly, who wouldn't want to worship such a loving and kind God!! I know I do!!
If there's one thing I've learned from this board, it's that consensual sex with multiple partners is okay unless God commands it. - Abman
I find this place to be hostile toward all brands of stupidity. That's why I like it. - Some Schmo
Mad Viking wrote:I'm unclear about the logic and reasoning that would have caused someone to become more faithful as a result of the attacks on 9/11/01.
stemelbow wrote:Its not that people looked to God based on logic and reasoning.
Truer words have never been spoken.
Mad Viking wrote:What about the murder of all of those people makes one think: "Hmmm... you know what? I really should be worshipping god more?" I don't get it. I was a fully believing and faithful Mormon on that day. I don't ever recall thinking that. It makes no sense to me.
stemelbow wrote:"We felt the great unsteadiness of life and reached for the great steadiness of our Father in Heaven"
Its just how it works.
That's the part that doesn't make sense to me. Our "Father in Heaven" didn't offer steadiness. He sat back and watched the planning and execution of the 9-11-01 attacks. Where is the steadiness that he provides?
"Sire, I had no need of that hypothesis" - Laplace