Yahoo Bot wrote:Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Bob is troll. Jesus, people.
V/R
Dr. C
I can assure you that they are not "Jesus people."
But let me guess - you think you are? :D
Yahoo Bot wrote:Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:Bob is troll. Jesus, people.
V/R
Dr. C
I can assure you that they are not "Jesus people."
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
liz3564 wrote:You don't seem to recognize that YOUR tactics are just as vile and insidious. You are purposely, by your own admission, pushing people's buttons just to get a reaction.
Kevin Graham wrote:That's pretty poor judgment for a former bishop to display.
Former Bishop?
ROFL!
Kevin Graham wrote:Again, CFR. The only message forum I have ever been banned from is MAD, which means I have been banned from as many forums as LDS apologists like Nomad, Loyd Ericson or Loran Blood.
When I think of the word "Banned" I think of Kevin Graham. One of the most frequently banned posters in any subject, and that probably isn't counting sock puppets. When you inspect this board's history with the word "banned," Kevin is usually in the middle of it, defending his conduct or boasting of his bannings. In fact, should Kevin move to Banning, California?
[What does that really reveal? A hopeless board addict, on a quest to have his name splashed everywhere.]
When I think of the phrase "oblivious" I think of Kevin Graham.
When I contemplate someone who is on the low road to hell, I think of Kevin Graham.
When I want to learn who the current idiot and moron might be, I'm hoping Red Graham will inform me.
"You're such a predictable moron Will." Fri Aug 20, 2010 11:39 am
"Look, moron. You are the one who has a serious problem comprehending here. And comprehension isn't even your main problem. Your main problem is that your mind is just too simple." Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:13 pm
"There is a difference between apologists like Bokovoy and complete morons like yourself." Sun Mar 13, 2011 5:44 pm
"Who the hell ever said anything about "academic-style" translation, moron?" Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:38 pm
"I see you're back to the usual falsehoods Dan. Do I need to list all the people I have disagreed with, whom I have not accused of being a "liar, a moron, an idiot, an incompetemt [sic], and/or a hypocrite"? " Fri Sep 02, 2011 12:16 am
Now, the last quote above is priceless. Here, Islamic Hater Red Graham calls Peterson a liar for, well, what? For having the foolishness to claim that Red Graham calls people with whom he disagrees a liar, a moron, and idiot etc.
MsJack wrote:
This is the real problem with any complaints about Kevin's behavior now. Kevin was an apologist for years and people seldom expressed concerns about his behavior, nor was he banned from the FAIR message board or MAD or ZLMB at the time.
I recall list bannings.So long as his anger and aggression were directed at critics, few cared, and those few who cared generally kept their concerns low-key.
You're just recalling what you want.Until LDS apologists start policing and speaking out against the poor behavior coming out of their own ranks, no one is going to take them seriously when they complain about poor behavior in their opponents. Kevin Graham is a textbook case of someone who's style only draws complaints now because he plays for the other team. Gospel truth, folks.
Untrue. At least I don't call you a liar because I disagree.
Do you think that Mormon apologia is so monolithic that there will be a police agency?
I frequently criticize the behavior of LDS apologists and editors and authors for bad behavior. When I post on MAD board, I'm frequently torched by the likes of Pahoran and others. But there isn't a master police agency.
The difference between this board and the MAD board, in terms of behavior, is that the MAD posters throttle back their criticisms, rarely making intensely personal attacks on one's livelihood or reputation --- because the board is moderated. Not true here.
Kevin has amazed me over the years as to his utter oblivion. He damn well thinks he is right all the time; he rarely is. Witness how he responds to attacks as to his style. He can't help himself; he just lashes out in an attempt to vilify his critic. I don't get it. He can't stay on topic -- he has to attack one's character at every turn
Really, Kevin, if you want to make fun of me or my profession, start another thread. But I condemn you and the horse you rode in on.
Droopy wrote:It's become a bit obvious why Mr. Graham routinely speaks of those who disagree with him as "stupid." Kevin really thinks they are. He's one of a rare breed of insatiable narcissists so absorbed by their own importance and brilliance that they perceive themselves to be surrounded by idiots
This is all true. Especially the part I highlighted. With all due respect to Kevin, when the topic turned to Islam and his then far right politics, he came across as so livid as to be unhinged. I have no problem with DCP, a scholar of Islam, having an intense dislike of him over that. But Kevin has mellowed considerably. He still runs hot at times, but it'll only take up digging up a few ZLMB threads to show how much worse it could be. He was Pahoran-esque. And the apologists showed nothing but praise or restraint for that behavior when it was aimed at critics.
Droopy wrote:He's one of a rare breed of insatiable narcissists so absorbed by their own importance and brilliance that they perceive themselves to be surrounded by idiots.
harmony wrote:Droopy wrote:It's become a bit obvious why Mr. Graham routinely speaks of those who disagree with him as "stupid." Kevin really thinks they are. He's one of a rare breed of insatiable narcissists so absorbed by their own importance and brilliance that they perceive themselves to be surrounded by idiots
You said that with a straight face. Impressive!
Droopy wrote:
I know a number of folks who perceive him in precisely the same manner.