The Nehor has left the building...

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

Be careful. You might be the 3rd person to be permanently banned from MDB.

Please name who I have permanently banned from MDB.

Hello Ms. Liz,

You permanently banned, according to your PM, "antishock8". That was my spouse who posted using that handle, but you mistaklingly thought it was I who posted that day.

You're a bit of a tyrant, to include your hypocrital Mormon ways. Again. I would like you to answer the following:

1) Does your Mormon husband know you have a "Goddess" personality on the Internet, and does he approve of you cyber-S&M'ing with other males?

2) Do you currently hold a temple recommend?

3) Does your Bishop know of your online behavior (comments on Mormon foundational claims, sexual aberrations, 5th Columnist activities)?

V/R
Dr. Cam "No Liz for Me" NC for Me

[_sock puppet]

Dr Cam,

I think virtual polyandry is the quintessential 21st Century thing for a Mormon woman to engage in.

[_Jersey Girl]

Hello Ms. Liz,

You permanently banned, according to your PM, "antishock8". That was my spouse who posted using that handle, but you mistaklingly thought it was I who posted that day.

You're a bit of a tyrant, to include your hypocrital Mormon ways.

She apparently did so with no protest from Dr. Shades. Is Dr. Shades a tyrant?

Again. I would like you to answer the following:

1) Does your Mormon husband know you have a "Goddess" personality on the Internet, and does he approve of you cyber-S&M'ing with other males?

That's not your business.

2) Do you currently hold a temple recommend?

That's not your business.

3) Does your Bishop know of your online behavior (comments on Mormon foundational claims, sexual aberrations, 5th Columnist activities)?

That's not your business.

V/R
Dr. Cam "No Liz for Me" NC for Me

Grow up.

[_Jersey Girl]

For better or for worse, another poster has left us. The Nehor quietly deleted his account and has decided to no longer post with us.

I, for one, will miss his wit, and his perspective.

liz, could you explain how when you wrote that you thought that you would be missing the Nehor's 'wit and his perspective', since he's been enrolled and participating with you all along in your private board?

And when you say 'another poster has left us' and 'decided to no longer post with us', weren't you meaning 'another poster has left some of you' and 'decided to no longer post with some of you'? Given your select subset, including yourself, it was not really accurate for you to say "us", now was it?

Were you trying to be deceptive to those of us not in your club house? Were you perpetrating a secret combination?

My guess is that she was addressing this particular audience and Nehor's participation on this board.

Is that not obvious?

[_Jersey Girl]

sock

That is one reason for my break with the board in late June. Why trifle with people that have unfounded beliefs, whether alone or in a herd? Why not keep it real and tell TBMs that they believe in BS with no basis? But if you keep it real and call BS to the TBMs, you're branded here as running the TBMs off. For critics like myself that realize that all Mormonism and its beliefs are is a big pile of BS, you don't keep it real by "respectfully" playing along with the deluded. You call it like it is, you call BS.

And when some TBM's "run off" elsewhere, some of you guys chase them down.

Do you think that is also BS?

[_sock puppet]

For better or for worse, another poster has left us. The Nehor quietly deleted his account and has decided to no longer post with us.

I, for one, will miss his wit, and his perspective.

liz, could you explain how when you wrote that you thought that you would be missing the Nehor's 'wit and his perspective', since he's been enrolled and participating with you all along in your private board?

And when you say 'another poster has left us' and 'decided to no longer post with us', weren't you meaning 'another poster has left some of you' and 'decided to no longer post with some of you'? Given your select subset, including yourself, it was not really accurate for you to say "us", now was it?

Were you trying to be deceptive to those of us not in your club house? Were you perpetrating a secret combination?

My guess is that she was addressing this particular audience and Nehor's participation on this board.

Is that not obvious?

To some it appears obvious, to others of us it does not. My 'guess' is something else was going on, just as her exclusive, private board has been revealed since she typed those inclusive sounding phrases.

[_Chap]

For better or for worse, another poster has left us. The Nehor quietly deleted his account and has decided to no longer post with us.

I, for one, will miss his wit, and his perspective.

liz, could you explain how when you wrote that you thought that you would be missing the Nehor's 'wit and his perspective', since he's been enrolled and participating with you all along in your private board?

And when you say 'another poster has left us' and 'decided to no longer post with us', weren't you meaning 'another poster has left some of you' and 'decided to no longer post with some of you'? Given your select subset, including yourself, it was not really accurate for you to say "us", now was it?

Were you trying to be deceptive to those of us not in your club house? Were you perpetrating a secret combination?

My guess is that she was addressing this particular audience and Nehor's participation on this board.

Is that not obvious?

Obviousness is sometimes in the eye of the beholder.

I can't imagine myself being in Liz's position of having started another board, having invited the Nehor to join it, and having him accept that invitation, then knowing all that to post as she did when he left this board.

Or if I did do that, I would be sniggering up my sleeve at the fact that the Nehor (like DCP) was already on my private board joining me in saying unpleasant things about some posters on this board (e.g. "vultures"), while I lamented his loss over here.

Perhaps I am just not as nice as you are, or as nice as you think Liz is, perhaps. But hey, who said all the members of this board were perfect?

[_sock puppet]

sock

That is one reason for my break with the board in late June. Why trifle with people that have unfounded beliefs, whether alone or in a herd? Why not keep it real and tell TBMs that they believe in BS with no basis? But if you keep it real and call BS to the TBMs, you're branded here as running the TBMs off. For critics like myself that realize that all Mormonism and its beliefs are is a big pile of BS, you don't keep it real by "respectfully" playing along with the deluded. You call it like it is, you call BS.

And when some TBM's "run off" elsewhere, some of you guys chase them down.

Do you think that is also BS?

I think discovering liz's private board, and reporting back the context that made liz's OP here quite duplicitous is not what I'd call 'chasing them down'.

Chasing them down would, in my view, involve hacking into their private board after it was closed, much like crashing a party. I don't know of that having happened. liz had left that board open to public view, even though only letting a few know of its existence and inviting them to it. She had no reasonable expectation of privacy while it was open to public view on the internet, and since she's closed it I do not know of any excluded person having hacked it. But if any excluded person has hacked into liz's now closed, private board, I would consider that 'chasing them down' and I would not condone that.

[_Simon Belmont]

The below are actual things a Cassuis Professor has recently stated.

A Cassius University Professor.

I remember someone getting the boot for much less.

Yes, I remember when I dared point out Ms. Liz's hypocrisy & 5th columnist activities. She absolutely lost her s***, started PM'ing me, and then banned me for a week.

I still wonder if her Bishop knows what she's up to on the Internet, and if she holds a temple recommend. I, for one, would never have guessed an active Mormon woman would have a "Goddess Suite" where she can "jokingly" indulge in S&M fantasies with other men.

Fire up that slut suite and be sure to invite the Bishop and Relief Society!

You're married to a guy who is 300 lbs. Gegh...

Gross.

No wonder you're whoring around on the Internet.

That aside. How can you as a temple-recommend holding woman secure a temple recommend while being a "Goddess" and an Internet Whore? Also, does your Bishop and your obese husband know what you do on the Internet?

act like an Internet Whore

Does her "300 lbs" husband knows what's she's up to? Does her Bishop knows what she posts? After all she fooled around with Mr. The Nehor in the "Goddess Suite".

You are vulgar. You are nasty.

A Cassius University Professor, guys. Here is his "bio" on the Cassius blog:

CamNC4Me, Doctor, professor of apologist ethics, is known affectionately as “Dr. Cam” by his students. A gentle soul, Dr. Cam always finds the time to close his dialogue “very respectfully”, a simple virtue that many don’t have time or inclination for in today’s busy and informal world. Can we do more to cultivate our civility? Dr. Cam’s tenure seeks to answer this question. It has been said that apologists who register for his course are often so thoroughly convicted with a knowledge of their guilt that they drop out of school within days. Dr. Cam is currently working on his magnum opus, a project very few are in the know about. We anticipate his work’s publication to delight all those who shall one day sup from its pages.

[_Jersey Girl]

Howdy Chap

You wrote,

Obviousness is sometimes in the eye of the beholder.

I can't imagine myself being in Liz's position of having started another board, having invited the Nehor to join it, and having him accept that invitation, then knowing all that to post as she did when he left this board.

What I see in the OP is that Liz was addressing this community of posters and discussing the loss of Nehor's participation on this board.

Or if I did do that, I would be sniggering up my sleeve at the fact that the Nehor (like DCP) was already on my private board joining me in saying unpleasant things about some posters on this board (e.g. "vultures"), while I lamented his loss over here.

Why would you be "sniggering up" your "sleeve"? Nehor chose to discontinue posting on this board. Liz announced that choice on this board. The interaction between posters on any given board is unique to the dynamic that builds between posters. That's what makes a board "tick". The Nehor's interaction on this board is history and that's what Liz appears to be addressing.

Perhaps I am just not as nice as you are, or as nice as you think Liz is, perhaps. But hey, who said all the members of this board were perfect?

It has nothing to do with being "nice", Chap. It has to do with reading comments in the context in which they are written. The context of the OP is this board.

Is there anything else you want to discuss?