The Nehor has left the building...

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _sock puppet »

liz3564 wrote:
Rock Slider wrote:And with Liz's many years of posting style here, she surely deserves the roast, right?


Sock Puppet wrote:Right!


May I ask why?

The 'roast' you have received by various MDB'Relief Society in the 11+ pages of this thread are each reflective of your style history. Each poster that has taken you to task, to one degree or another, in this thread has reflected back what they see from your posting style.

Are they each and everyone wrong and suspect for having dared call you on the carpet?

Rockslider asked if you deserved this roasting, these reflections back. When I take the group of these 'roasters' together, look at them, how they reacted to you, specifically in response to this OP of yours, I did not see anything out of line or disproportionate in the response. So, yes, I see it as deserved.

I will not re-hash the reactions, the 'roastings', as the thread is open to be read or re-read by any of us. Your OP in this thread triggered these reactions. Has that caused you to pause and reflect on your style? Any introspection at all?

I certainly do not speak for STS, but when he impugned yesterday the moderating on MDB, the only admin or mod that came to my mind was you, liz. You are trigger happy to put Dr Scratch down, and to protect your gaggle of TBM geese. Even after The Nehor quietly departed, your protectorate instincts came out. Maybe you're a NOM with TBM-envy.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _sock puppet »

moksha wrote:I think of Liz's post as a call to repentance for being abusive of another poster. Someone has to stand up to playground bullies lest we all start staying in class during recess.

But Moksha, aren't you reading? Or don't you take liz at face value?

She protests that was not her purpose in the OP or starting this thread.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _Jersey Girl »

sock puppet wrote:In the brief interlude between its existence being exposed and liz taking her board out of public view, I looked at what she had open to the public internet. I saw who were registered posters. I did not take a listing. So my comments about her registrants are based on my impressions of looking on what was then open to the public internet, and my memory thereof.


You said it was "simply critic free". How do you know that it's critic free?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _sock puppet »

Jersey Girl wrote:
sock puppet wrote:In the brief interlude between its existence being exposed and liz taking her board out of public view, I looked at what she had open to the public internet. I saw who were registered posters. I did not take a listing. So my comments about her registrants are based on my impressions of looking on what was then open to the public internet, and my memory thereof.


You said it was "simply critic free". How do you know that it's critic free?

My memory of who is registered, and what posts I read when in the public view, lead me to so conclude. I'd be happy to reconsider, if liz wants to reopen her board for public viewing. Short of that, Jersey Girl, I have only my memory.

Do you have specific information to the contrary, Jersey Girl, that you'd like to share here?
_Simon Belmont

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _Simon Belmont »

sock puppet wrote:My memory of who is registered, and what posts I read when in the public view, lead me to so conclude. I'd be happy to reconsider, if liz wants to reopen her board for public viewing. Short of that, Jersey Girl, I have only my memory.


Okay so why are you harping on something that may or may not be the case, based on your memory alone?

Do you have specific information to the contrary, Jersey Girl, that you'd like to share here?


Burden of proof. You made the claim.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _Jersey Girl »

sock puppet wrote:In the brief interlude between its existence being exposed and liz taking her board out of public view, I looked at what she had open to the public internet. I saw who were registered posters. I did not take a listing. So my comments about her registrants are based on my impressions of looking on what was then open to the public internet, and my memory thereof.


Jersey Girl wrote:You said it was "simply critic free". How do you know that it's critic free?


sock puppet wrote:My memory of who is registered, and what posts I read when in the public view, lead me to so conclude. I'd be happy to reconsider, if liz wants to reopen her board for public viewing. Short of that, Jersey Girl, I have only my memory.

Do you have specific information to the contrary, Jersey Girl, that you'd like to share here?


Where is your specific information for the positive claim that you made regarding Liz's board? You asserted that it was "simply critic free".

You have no proof to support that assertion, sock, so why make it?

I have no reason to share "specific information" to the contrary. Had you read the posts on this thread that you're posting on, you'd see that your assertion isn't true.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _sock puppet »

Simon Belmont wrote:
sock puppet wrote:My memory of who is registered, and what posts I read when in the public view, lead me to so conclude. I'd be happy to reconsider, if liz wants to reopen her board for public viewing. Short of that, Jersey Girl, I have only my memory.


Okay so why are you harping on something that may or may not be the case, based on your memory alone?

Do you have specific information to the contrary, Jersey Girl, that you'd like to share here?


Burden of proof. You made the claim.

I'm not harping on her private board. I'm taking issue with her duplicity in posting the OP of this thread, in the secret context of having such a board and ongoing communications with The Nehor on Mormon topics. She bemoaned missing him, when he was not gone from her circle of Mormon communications. liz yet had and has The Nehor's 'wit, and his perspective' on Mormon issues. There was nothing for her to 'miss', unless enjoying see him be dismissive and condescending to critics. And isn't that that same brush with which she brushes critics--only in the vein of complaining about them rather than appreciating the wit and perspective of critics engaging The Nehor? Wiggle all she wants, liz's true colors--and they're not of the moderate type one expects of a moderator--became more than evident.

Burden of proof? Did DCP feed you that one? Maybe ttribe the whiner? The make up of her board is only an incidental matter to the duplicity liz has her demonstrated. Don't try to derail from the issue at hand.
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _sock puppet »

Jersey Girl wrote:
sock puppet wrote:In the brief interlude between its existence being exposed and liz taking her board out of public view, I looked at what she had open to the public internet. I saw who were registered posters. I did not take a listing. So my comments about her registrants are based on my impressions of looking on what was then open to the public internet, and my memory thereof.


You said it was "simply critic free". How do you know that it's critic free?

Ah, Jersey Girl. You made me look--again.

You'll be happy to know that liz's list of registrants is yet publicly available information. Here they are:


liz3564
Scottie
Daniel Peterson
the nehor
Uncle Dale
Moksha
Ray Agostini
Ms. Jack
Gramps
Malkie
Harmony
Chickdeario
Astyanax (Thrown from the walls of Troy)
consiglieri
beastie
Blixa
The Dude
ttribe
Jason Bourne
sleepyhead
Daniel O. McClellan
Runtu
Darth J
Tarski
Timpanogos
Judge Holden
why me
Rich Kelsey

So which ones do you think betrayed liz's confidence?
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _Jersey Girl »

sock puppet wrote:Ah, Jersey Girl. You made me look--again.

You'll be happy to know that liz's list of registrants is yet publicly available information. Here they are:


liz3564
Scottie
Daniel Peterson
the nehor
Uncle Dale
Moksha
Ray Agostini
Ms. Jack
Gramps
Malkie
Harmony
Chickdeario
Astyanax (Thrown from the walls of Troy)
consiglieri
beastie
Blixa
The Dude
ttribe
Jason Bourne
sleepyhead
Daniel O. McClellan
Runtu
Darth J
Tarski
Timpanogos
Judge Holden
why me
Rich Kelsey

So which ones do you think betrayed liz's confidence?


I have no idea who might have betrayed liz's confidence. Some of the people to whom she extended an invitation chose to register and some did not.

Given the above list, do you maintain that her board is "simply critic free"?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The Nehor has left the building...

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Sock,

On another thread you made the following remark.

I also push back at those trying to displace the autonomous decision making by individuals.




How does the above hold true in light of your criticism's of liz's board?
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply