More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _Themis »

hugh jass wrote:It is online.

http://LDS.org/ensign/2011/10?lang=eng

Fresh unguarded meat... HAVE AT IT!!


Shows that the OP was right.
42
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _why me »

Themis wrote:
mentalgymnast wrote:
http://LDS.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnex ... 6f620a____

You guys need to become familiar with google search. Any member that has internet access can find this table and the accompanying information within a minute. I did.

Regards,
MG


Most members have to go out of their way to do this, and it still avoids all the problems, and the OP is still right that the article in question avoids those problems. If an article is going to answer the question is should at least answer the whole question instead of just bringing up the trivial matters.


Is this a joke? I suppose that the LDS church can put up notices every other year about the changes. Or I suppose that they can put it in every study manual and in the ensign every month. But here is the problem: people like you keep trumpeting the same tune even though the trumpet sound has been proven out of key.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _why me »

bcspace wrote:
Most members have to go out of their way to do this


Most members don't have an issue with it nor would they even if placed more prominently. Just because you think it ought to be front and center doesn't mean it ought to be.


The problem is that critics and antimormons keep bringing out the same old trumpet on their websites attempting to convince members that they have been cheated from the truth. The old trumpet is played over and over again without the benefit of a fine tuning. And the members who may find their arguments convincing, begin to doubt.

And that is te reason for the same old trumpet. Members need to fine tune their ears.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _why me »

Themis wrote:
hugh jass wrote:It is online.

http://LDS.org/ensign/2011/10?lang=eng

Fresh unguarded meat... HAVE AT IT!!


Shows that the OP was right.


Really? I suppose that you need to believe this. But you also know that it isn't true. The fact is the LDS church will never do something right in your humble opinion.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world.
Joseph Smith


We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…”
Joseph Smith
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _Themis »

why me wrote:
Is this a joke? I suppose that the LDS church can put up notices every other year about the changes. Or I suppose that they can put it in every study manual and in the ensign every month. But here is the problem: people like you keep trumpeting the same tune even though the trumpet sound has been proven out of key.


You could at least try reading what I said. Do you have to make things up about what I said? In fact lets look at what I actually said

Themis

It just not being honest on their part to bring up the subject and not talk about the bigger problems and make it look like trivial spelling and grammatical errors.


The issue is the church bringing it up and then avoiding the real problems to make it look like there are not any.

Themis

I am not saying the church has to bring up the issue, but when they do, I think they should at least be honest with it.


Now I seem to be saying here exactly the opposite of what you accuse me of. I think I deserve an apology, but I doubt I will get one from you since my statement below probably applies to you.

Themis

It's always funny to some defenders who will defend anything the church does. At least people like Nevo can admit such things on a number of things. Even DCP thought the church was not being entirely honest using pictures of Joseph translating the plates in full view of a scribe.


You are definitely not in the same boat as DCP and Nevo from what I have seen.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
42
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _Themis »

why me wrote:
Really? I suppose that you need to believe this. But you also know that it isn't true. The fact is the LDS church will never do something right in your humble opinion.


The evidence that I am right is right there. Go read it for yourself. You will not find the bigger problems listed. You might try being open minded some of the time, and yes I do think the church can and does many things right. I think many positives things about the church, and hope that it can change in more positive ways. I still associate with the church and especially it's members.
42
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _Morley »

why me wrote:
The problem is that critics and antimormons keep bringing out the same old trumpet on their websites attempting to convince members that they have been cheated from the truth. The old trumpet is played over and over again without the benefit of a fine tuning. And the members who may find their arguments convincing, begin to doubt.

And that is te reason for the same old trumpet. Members need to fine tune their ears.


That trumpet sounds pretty in tune to me.

Image
_Pollypinks
_Emeritus
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:36 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _Pollypinks »

We miss the boat here. The vast majority of Mormons don't want to know about changes, and if they are told by the authorities, are going to take it very well, and assume the prophet has good things in store for them. Nobody reads like my dad does. I've never known a better read man, yet, when it comes to changes in the Book of Mormon, he's got every silly excuse possible. And this from a man who thinks 2/3 of it is trash, and got in trouble in church for saying so.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _Jason Bourne »

bcspace wrote:So one would think. But most active members are returned missionaries or are familiar with one and many of those have been exposed to the issue. My sense is that most criticisms seen here are known to more than half the people you see in Church on any given Sunday.


Nope BC. Most have no idea about many of the issues. And most are not returned missionaries. Maybe among the men a good many are. But many women have not served and in places away from Utah many of the members are converts. So they did not serve missions either. And even if they did I do not see the necessary correlation between serving a mission and being exposed to numerous criticisms of the Church. I saw some as a missionary but ran into a lot more later as I read more and wrangled with critics more, because I enjoyed such things.

Honestly I wonder what la la land Mormon circles you run in.
_Pollypinks
_Emeritus
Posts: 153
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:36 pm

Re: More obfuscation in the current Ensign (Oct 2011)

Post by _Pollypinks »

All you have to do to be in la la land is be a female, start producing babies for the kingdom, and serve in the church. Your brain and body don't have any more time for much else. I know I've mentioned it elsewhere, so I don't know if it was mentioned here or not, but after I had two kids I had a hysterectomy. The Relief Society sisters would whisper in my ear, "I'm sorry." PHwat?? I wanted to produce brains, not numbers.
Post Reply