Peterson at it again, blasting away in the comments

[_Buffalo]

The OP probably amounts to whining. But most of the responses do not, other than your own. You're really only adding to the whining quotient (which is pretty small) with your current strategy.

Thanks for conceding the point here, Buffalo. I wasn't sure whether you were trying to go back on it or not. Anyway, if the OP amounts to whining then why not expect whining to be the order of the day, or thread? Here you are complaining about me for whining but yet you didn't realize the OP was nothing but whining untilI pointed it out to you and you don't seem too concerned to say anything to infymus about it. You only wish to come after me for what you perceive as whining.

its weird stuff, Buffalo. If you truly feel it all as helpful then cool. I hear ya. You'd rather complain about an LDS poster who responds to incessant whining from those on your side, characterizing the LDS poster as the whiner, because of course doing that is far more suitable to your agenda then pointing out the flaws and weaknesses of those who wish to saddle up on your side. Liek I said, weird stuff.

A thread is more than the contents of its initial post. Basic forumology 101, Stem.

[_stemelbow]

A thread is more than the contents of its initial post. Basic forumology 101, Stem.

I can agree with that, but you chimed in on this thread complaining about me when I commented about how the OP was whining. You see you selectively skipped over the whining of your buds to complain about me.

[_Buffalo]

A thread is more than the contents of its initial post. Basic forumology 101, Stem.

I can agree with that, but you chimed in on this thread complaining about me when I commented about how the OP was whining. You see you selectively skipped over the whining of your buds to complain about me.

Ah well, that's tribalism. I don't hear you complaining much about whining at MAD. Pep pep!

[_stemelbow]

Ah well, that's tribalism. I don't hear you complaining much about whining at MAD. Pep pep!

you also don't see me going after a critic at MAD who happens to comment on the poor behavior of some LDS. Indeed quite often I've supported a critic who so comments if I can agree with the critics idea and in hopes to better the environment.

[_Buffalo]

Ah well, that's tribalism. I don't hear you complaining much about whining at MAD. Pep pep!

you also don't see me going after a critic at MAD who happens to comment on the poor behavior of some LDS. Indeed quite often I've supported a critic who so comments if I can agree with the critics idea and in hopes to better the environment.

Sorry, but I don't think whining is something that needs to be "gone after." Bullying, sure. I've called critics out for that.

[_jon]

Stem,

I've been searching through your posts on this board and I cannot find one where you call out any Apologist for whining. There must be one because you state that you don't like hypocrisy. Can you point me in the right direction so that I can admire you 'going after' them?

[_stemelbow]

Stem,

I've been searching through your posts on this board and I cannot find one where you call out any Apologist for whining. There must be one because you state that you don't like hypocrisy. Can you point me in the right direction so that I can admire you 'going after' them?

pep pep...nice try, jon.

[_jon]

Stem,

I've been searching through your posts on this board and I cannot find one where you call out any Apologist for whining. There must be one because you state that you don't like hypocrisy. Can you point me in the right direction so that I can admire you 'going after' them?

pep pep...nice try, jon.

Oh Stem, that's disappointing.
I kind of figured you for a double standards kind of a guy, but I'd hoped I was wrong.

Oh well...that's cool...I guess...

[_Simon Belmont]

I'm neither complaining nor being whiny. I am straight out attacking DCP, as I have always attacked DCP.

Why? What did he do to you? Was it because of the SHIELDS thing? What, exactly, did this person do to you to deserve years of Internet stalking and blatant attacks from you? Please spell it out for me.

DCP is a paid charlatan for the Mormon Corporation. As long as he continues to register on sites in order to sell his brand of snake oil - I will be there to attack him for it.

So DCP cannot register on sites to "sell his brand of snake-oil" but you can register on sites, including your own domain(s) to sell your brand of anti-Mormonism and bigotry?

Gee, that seems fair.

And you can whine all you want about this. I don't really give a f*** and I think over the last five years of my being on MDB, you would probably realize that.

I know you don't care, Infymus. I know you don't care about anyone or anything except yourself and your hate. It's sad, really.

But you and other DCP lapdogs who dance at his heels will continue to do so, whatever Steme. Get the last word in, do what you need to do to make yourself feel better. In the end it, the kingpin of Mormon apologetics is once again at work on outside forums/blogs spouting off Mormonism, misleading people about Mormonism, directing people to Mormon websites in the hopes that he can try and convert them to a cult that is so easily, easily dismissed.

It is so funny when anti-Mormons say things like this. If the LDS church is a "cult" that is "so easily, easily dismissed" when why hasn't it been proven false in almost 200 years? And don't tell me no one has tried.

Defend him. All you end up doing is exactly what you accuse me of - being a whiny complainer.

Here is the bottom line: DCP, just like anyone else, has the freedom to do whatever he wants within the boundaries of the law. It is not your job to deny him, or anyone else, anything!

[_jon]

If the LDS church is "so easily, easily dismissed" when why hasn't it been proven false in almost 200 years?

It has. Lots of times.
What you mean is, it hasn't been proven false to YOU.