Simon, a new perspective

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Simon Belmont

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _Simon Belmont »

I know you're being a smart-ass, relax.

Darth J wrote:You do not appear to understand what "cosplay" is, so let me give you a hint: when doctors dress up like doctors while they're at work, they aren't pretending.


When we attend the temple, we aren't pretending either.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _Darth J »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Darth J wrote:You do not appear to understand what "cosplay" is, so let me give you a hint: when doctors dress up like doctors while they're at work, they aren't pretending.


When we attend the temple, we aren't pretending either.


Right, Simon. It's real. You have in fact attained godhood.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _Buffalo »

schreech wrote:
Simon Belmont wrote:When we attend the temple, we aren't pretending either.


You aren't pretending to be adam and eve, "respectively"? What does the "apron" represent again?


Simon, like many LDS defenders, seems to have a grade D understanding of his own religion.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Simon Belmont

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _Simon Belmont »

schreech wrote:You aren't pretending to be adam and eve, "respectively"? What does the "apron" represent again?


Allegory is not pretense.
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _schreech »

Simon Belmont wrote:
Allegory is not pretense.


But dressing up in "coats of skins" and pretending to be adam and eve is certainly cosplay....
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _Buffalo »

Simon Belmont wrote:
schreech wrote:You aren't pretending to be adam and eve, "respectively"? What does the "apron" represent again?


Allegory is not pretense.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Yoda

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _Yoda »

Darth J wrote:You do not appear to understand what "cosplay" is, so let me give you a hint: when doctors dress up like doctors while they're at work, they aren't pretending.


Simon wrote:When we attend the temple, we aren't pretending either.


Darth wrote:Right, Simon. It's real. You have in fact attained godhood.


I think that there is a difference between pretending and symbolism. In the LDS temple, the clothing used is symbolic of, as you mentioned, stages of godhood. However, as Simon pointed out, to those of the LDS faith, the "work", or establishing covenants for ourselves or loved ones who have passed away, is a very real part of the LDS faith.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _Darth J »

liz3564 wrote:
I think that there is a difference between pretending and symbolism. In the LDS temple, the clothing used is symbolic of, as you mentioned, stages of godhood. However, as Simon pointed out, to those of the LDS faith, the "work", or establishing covenants for ourselves or loved ones who have passed away, is a very real part of the LDS faith.


"The work" = cosplay

Cosplay = "a type of performance art in which participants don costumes and accessories to represent a specific character or idea."

EDIT: And what you are stating is double cosplay, Liz, since you are pretending to be a dead person who is pretending to be Adam or Eve.
Last edited by Guest on Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _schreech »

Buffalo wrote:
schreech wrote:Simon, like many LDS defenders, seems to have a grade D understanding of his own religion.


The more I realize this, the less interested I am in trying to interact with them...I would expect self-proclaimed LDS "defenders" to actually have a basic understanding of the LDS church and its teachings but that seems to be asking too much...Unfortunately, I wasn't raised in simonism so I can't really discuss his made up belief system with him...I just wish he would stop calling it mormism as its confusing to those of us who are actually LDS...
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_Yoda

Re: Simon, a new perspective

Post by _Yoda »

Darth J wrote:
liz3564 wrote:
I think that there is a difference between pretending and symbolism. In the LDS temple, the clothing used is symbolic of, as you mentioned, stages of godhood. However, as Simon pointed out, to those of the LDS faith, the "work", or establishing covenants for ourselves or loved ones who have passed away, is a very real part of the LDS faith.


"The work" = cosplay

Cosplay = "a type of performance art in which participants don costumes and accessories to represent a specific character or idea."


OK...I understand your point, now.

I guess my argument would be that I don't necessarily find the use of cosplay in a religion as negative. Why do you?
Post Reply