Abaddon wrote:
My experience was far more (in my opinion) than warm fuzzies. I'm not prone to spiritual experiences. It has happened only once.
I've often questioned why it happened to me and hasn't happened to many others (especially others that want it to happen and end up leaving the church because it didn't). I've also questioned why the General Authorities will often say the witness may not come in a powerful way, but slowly and with quiet thoughts or assurances. That wasn't my experience. It did come in a very powerful, poignant and personal way.
That is why I look evidence in the face and go with my experience. Foolish?
Do you consider the brain incapable of producing powerful experiences on their own? Do people have powerful experiences and come away with a multitude of different meanings? Should we not then consider evidence that contradicts what meaning we have come away with. I know I have, but we each get to decide for ourselves. :)