The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _just me »

Paul is brave. The church shouldn't have taught gay men to marry women to "cure" them of their homosexuality.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _Darth J »

Yahoo Bot wrote:
I might add that one who leaves his wife and children to have sex with another person or group of persons is a fraud and a mountebank.


Image
_CSA
_Emeritus
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 2:59 pm

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _CSA »

Shulem wrote:If there is a hereafter I will continue to love boys in any manner I wish according to my desires. It is evil to forbid one to be who they really are -- live, love, be.

Paul O


Let me get this straight, your preference is to love young boys over a heterosexual relationship?
_Yahoo Bot
_Emeritus
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _Yahoo Bot »

You ask why it is the LDS faithful aren't here to defend their religion.

I don't care who is gay and who is not. But there is so much reprehensible about Paul and his defender friends here that a decent person would want to hurl. I wonder where Paul's kids are while he's doing boys. I suspect the answer. Some other guy is raising them.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _Darth J »

CSA wrote:
Shulem wrote:If there is a hereafter I will continue to love boys in any manner I wish according to my desires. It is evil to forbid one to be who they really are -- live, love, be.

Paul O


Let me get this straight, your preference is to love young boys over a heterosexual relationship?


No, no, no. Loving boys over a heterosexual relationship is getting it gay, not getting it straight.
_Darth J
_Emeritus
Posts: 13392
Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _Darth J »

Yahoo Bot wrote:You ask why it is the LDS faithful aren't here to defend their religion.

I don't care who is gay and who is not. But there is so much reprehensible about Paul and his defender friends here that a decent person would want to hurl. I wonder where Paul's kids are while he's doing boys. I suspect the answer. Some other guy is raising them.


I wonder if Emma ever got lonely or wondered where her husband was when Joseph Smith was out having sex with his concubines.
_Yahoo Bot
_Emeritus
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _Yahoo Bot »

Darth J wrote:
Yahoo Bot wrote:You ask why it is the LDS faithful aren't here to defend their religion.

I don't care who is gay and who is not. But there is so much reprehensible about Paul and his defender friends here that a decent person would want to hurl. I wonder where Paul's kids are while he's doing boys. I suspect the answer. Some other guy is raising them.


I wonder if Emma ever got lonely or wondered where her husband was when Joseph Smith was out having sex with his concubines.


Diversion.

Divorce and abandoning your kids is evil, much the more so to do boys. If he excuses his conduct because your hero Joseph Smith did it, he is much more the evil one.
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _Shulem »

I might add that one who leaves his wife and children to have sex with another person or group of persons is a fraud and a mountebank. In nearly any culture. Orientation is irrelevant. Mr. Osbourne had the capacity to live the truth. He lived a lie.

Why he chooses to make his reprehensible personal life a matter of public discourse is odd.



Bot,

Let's get the record straight (no pun intended). I was faithful to my wife and church during my 20 year marriage. I lived in the closet. But it was my wife that left me. I would probably still be with her today had she not divorced me. I'd be living a lie, in the closet. That's the fruits of Mormonism for gay men.

Now, you shove it -- boy(bot) -- where ever you want to shove it. I wouldn't touch you with a 10ft poll because I dislike you so much. You're cyber rotten.

And, you spelled my name wrong.

Paul O
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _Shulem »

CSA wrote:
Shulem wrote:If there is a hereafter I will continue to love boys in any manner I wish according to my desires. It is evil to forbid one to be who they really are -- live, love, be.

Paul O


Let me get this straight, your preference is to love young boys over a heterosexual relationship?


Yep, I'm extremely attracted to cute young boys (legal age). But I like men too!

I have no sexual desires for women.

Does that answer your question?

Paul O
_Shulem
_Emeritus
Posts: 12072
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:48 am

Re: The Double Standard in the LDS Law of Chastity (pic heavy)

Post by _Shulem »

Yahoo Bot wrote:You ask why it is the LDS faithful aren't here to defend their religion.

I don't care who is gay and who is not. But there is so much reprehensible about Paul and his defender friends here that a decent person would want to hurl. I wonder where Paul's kids are while he's doing boys. I suspect the answer. Some other guy is raising them.


Bot, you are evil in painting me as a demon.

My kids are now grown adults. My youngest was 16 when my wife divorced me and I made child support payments faithfully as ordered by the court.

Now, I'm pleased to hear you say that you don't care who is gay and who is not. Well, I'm gay. So leave it at that. I don't care to try and educate your sorry mind any further.

Get lost.

Paul O
Post Reply