Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _The Dude »

Hoops wrote:
Kinda like Rosa Parks knowingly violating a rule, presumably to promote some agenda?

The horror!

No, not anything like Rosa Parks. May be just as unfair, but the two are not the same. You should be able to see that.


I don't see anything wrong with breaking unfair rules. Having sex at BYU. Smoking marijuana at a party. Keeping homosexuality a secret so you can serve your country (or just keep your job). Breaking unfair rules is part of changing the rules for the better.
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _Some Schmo »

Just when you thought he couldn't be any damned dumber, Hoops talks again.

Why don't you shut the “F” up and leave the thinking to people with a brain? F*cking moron. Jesus called... he needs you to give him your little bone again.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _Hoops »

Some Schmo wrote:Just when you thought he couldn't be any f*****g dumber, Hoops talks again.

Why don't you shut the f*** up and leave the thinking to people with a brain? F*cking moron. Jesus called... he needs you to give him your little bone again.

Oh, is the tiny little man upset again? are your size 6 shoes rubbing blisters on your feet again cuz they're too big?
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _asbestosman »

The Dude wrote:I don't see anything wrong with breaking unfair rules. Having sex at BYU. Smoking marijuana at a party. Keeping homosexuality a secret so you can serve your country (or just keep your job). Breaking unfair rules is part of changing the rules for the better.


I find there's a difference between the sort of rules I'll tolerate on a voluntary basis at someone's home, those I'll voluntarily tolerate from an entity such as BYU, and mandatory laws I'll tolerate from the government.Even then, I'll tolerate some laws I find unfair. I don't like the way rich people enjoy certain tax loopholes, but I'm not going to try tax evasion to protest it.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _asbestosman »

Hoops wrote:No, not anything like Rosa Parks. May be just as unfair, but the two are not the same. You should be able to see that.

Sure they're different. One was done by a black woman and one by a homosexual.

I'm failing to see what the significant difference here was given the context of your words about agendas and violating rules. Perhaps you could enlighten me rather than playing some variant of the cliché game "if you don't know, then I'm certainly not going to tell you" or some other guessing game.
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_Some Schmo
_Emeritus
Posts: 15602
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:59 pm

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _Some Schmo »

Hoops wrote: Oh, is the tiny little man upset again? are your size 6 shoes rubbing blisters on your feet again cuz they're too big?

You strike me as the kind of guy with a foot fetish. The nice thing about Jesus is he's got nail holes in his feet you can hump. And of course, if that gets old, he can always give you a hand job without ever closing his hand around your tiny member.

You lucky devil, you.
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _Sethbag »

The "Don't Ask/Don't Tell" rule was crafted specifically as a wink wink/nod nod way for homosexuals to serve in the military. While officially there was a prohibition against their serving, the policy was specifically undermined by the very public decision not to ask candidates for military service about their sexuality. Also, candidates for military service were told, specifically, not to tell anyone. So, this soldier signed up, and presumably didn't tell anyone he was gay until after DADT was repealed. Sounds to me like he was doing pretty much exactly what he should have.

Also, Hoops, seriously, you think all these gays joined the military while keeping their sexual orientation a secret in order to promote an agenda? I agree with you, if by "promote agenda" you mean "in order to have a job". There are a lot of good opportunities for people in the military. I think gay people joined the military for pretty much the same reasons anyone else did - not to promote some kind of political agenda.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _Hoops »

Sethbag wrote:
The "Don't Ask/Don't Tell" rule was crafted specifically as a wink wink/nod nod way for homosexuals to serve in the military.

Yep, it was a pretty crappy rule. One your boy put into place. Don't blame republicans for that one.

While officially there was a prohibition against their serving, the policy was specifically undermined by the very public decision not to ask candidates for military service about their sexuality. Also, candidates for military service were told, specifically, not to tell anyone. So, this soldier signed up, and presumably didn't tell anyone he was gay until after DADT was repealed. Sounds to me like he was doing pretty much exactly what he should have.
yes, he was. Are we talking about him? Or are we talking about the booing that you referenced earlier, because if we are you will have show evidence that the booing was in response the soldier being gay, rather than at the rule itself. And you will have to show evidence it was actually "republitards' doing the booing because the soldier is gay.

Also, Hoops, seriously, you think all these gays joined the military while keeping their sexual orientation a secret in order to promote an agenda?
so now we're talking about "all these gays"? I thought we were talking about the one. And if we are, for one to get up in a public forum and announce his sexual orientation it's reasonable to conclude that he has an agenda.

I agree with you, if by "promote agenda" you mean "in order to have a job". There are a lot of good opportunities for people in the military. I think gay people joined the military for pretty much the same reasons anyone else did - not to promote some kind of political agenda.
Me to. What is it exactly that would make you satisfied here?
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _Hoops »

Some Schmo wrote:
Hoops wrote: Oh, is the tiny little man upset again? are your size 6 shoes rubbing blisters on your feet again cuz they're too big?

You strike me as the kind of guy with a foot fetish. The nice thing about Jesus is he's got nail holes in his feet you can hump. And of course, if that gets old, he can always give you a hand job without ever closing his hand around your tiny member.

You lucky devil, you.

try stretching exercises, you might make 5'8" yet.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Republican candidate cravenness and Romney/Cult thing

Post by _Hoops »

asbestosman wrote: I don't like the way rich people enjoy certain tax loopholes, but I'm not going to try tax evasion to protest it.

Ah, I see. Just another angry liberal. So predictable.


Edited to attribute this inane comment to the right person.
Post Reply