John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_floatingboy
_Emeritus
Posts: 299
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:29 pm

Re: John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

Post by _floatingboy »

I put "How much would you say you know about the key issues people have with the Church?"
-"I was gonna say something but I forgot what it was."
-"Well, it must not have been very important or you wouldn't've forgotten it!"
-"Oh, I remember. I'm radioactive."
_Infymus
_Emeritus
Posts: 1584
Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:10 pm

Re: John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

Post by _Infymus »

When is John going to realize that the Mormon church isn't going to change for anyone? It exists to serve itself.

They just need to excommunicate him and be done with it and John needs to get on with his life without Mormonism.
_NorthboundZax
_Emeritus
Posts: 344
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:17 pm

Re: John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

Post by _NorthboundZax »

That was kind of fun.

My final comment/question was:
The Doctrine & Covenants explicitly states that the word of wisdom is not a commandment. Despite no direct revelation overturning that, it is treated as a defining commandment of the religion - in essence a revelation overturned by leadership assertion. When other churches treat scripture that way, we call that apostate. Why should we view view the church's stance, contrary to explicit scripture, as anything else?
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

Post by _Buffalo »

NorthboundZax wrote:That was kind of fun.

My final comment/question was:
The Doctrine & Covenants explicitly states that the word of wisdom is not a commandment. Despite no direct revelation overturning that, it is treated as a defining commandment of the religion - in essence a revelation overturned by leadership assertion. When other churches treat scripture that way, we call that apostate. Why should we view view the church's stance, contrary to explicit scripture, as anything else?


Nice!

I had a huge long spiel, didn't think to C&P
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Re: John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

Post by _Sethbag »

I filled out the survey. I hope to hear what comes of it.

The problem, as I see it, is that the church really isn't true. All of the problems with the Book of Mormon and Book of Abraham, the First Vision, failed scriptural writings about the history of the world (Garden of Eden, Flood of Noah) that are now discredited, etc. are really all just fruits. or consequences of this.

The church covers a lot of this stuff up in order to protect members' fragile testimonies. The church apparently reckons that they'll lose more testimonies if they're upfront about this stuff than they'll lose if they cover it up and some small number of members are exposed to it anyhow. I think they're probably right in this calculation.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Simon Southerton
_Emeritus
Posts: 623
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:09 pm

I don't think the church asked for the poll

Post by _Simon Southerton »

jon wrote:Why would an organisation that has a direct line to God need to utilise a survey by John Dehlin to find out what people think about them?

If the Church was serious about members views, there would be a system in place for the Leaders to gain regular feedback.


I think this is driven largely by John, and I think what he is trying to achieve is useful. A couple of years ago I found John really hard to take. He seemed desperate to find a way to believe so he could stay in the community. His views have shifted considerably over the years and they are not in the direction a lot of Mormons would like. Now he seems to be trying to get the higher ups to face the fact that there are historical problems and that families are being torn apart because many are struggling with them. Having someone like him get the ear of a senior leader has to be good.

by the way, when I tried to post about John's poll on RFM the admin pulled it. I've had a few posts pulled in the past over there. RFM is turning into a personal message board for the admin.
LDS apologetics --> "It's not the crime, it's the cover-up, which creates the scandal."
"Bigfoot is a crucial part of the ecosystem, if he exists. So let's all help keep Bigfoot possibly alive for future generations to enjoy, unless he doesn't exist." - Futurama
_Tchild
_Emeritus
Posts: 2437
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 2:44 am

Re: John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

Post by _Tchild »

Thanks for the link The Dude. I took the poll for curiosities sake.

I don't believe for so many reasons that a poll just cannot capture.

The best part is that I am wholly uninterested and completely apathetic to trying to change, persuade or cajole LDS leaders to seeing my point of view. Why should I, I am on a different path and am interested in my own spiritual/mental progress and am not concerned with how others opine of my life journey.

Imagine talking with old elementary school era friends about the whys and hows of no longer believing and wanting to be part of a "tree fort club" that was important at age 9-11 but is now seen as childish and long past importance.

Good bye Mormonism.
_mms
_Emeritus
Posts: 642
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:10 pm

Re: John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

Post by _mms »

Took it.
_The Dude
_Emeritus
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:16 am

Re: John Dehlin's poll -- data on why you no longer believe

Post by _The Dude »

Tchild wrote:Imagine talking with old elementary school era friends about the whys and hows of no longer believing and wanting to be part of a "tree fort club" that was important at age 9-11 but is now seen as childish and long past importance.

Good bye Mormonism.


No kidding.

Which of these were major factors in your disaffection with the tree fort club:
Another club member offended you
You wanted to hold hands with a girl (against club rules)
The swing set club lured you away with cupcakes and punch
You figured out the club president's card tricks were not real magic

Is there anything the tree fort club could do to get you back?
"And yet another little spot is smoothed out of the echo chamber wall..." Bond
Post Reply