Are you having fun with that mental gymnastics? Dude it is soooo clear! It's so obvious! Name these f*****g bulls-eyes. I haven't heard of any. All I have seen is a bunch of big time misses.
I'm tired, really, really tired, of attempting serious discourse with closed, uninformed adolescent minds.
But, look where we are...
Yes Droopy you are sooo smart.
Any moron can see Joseph got it wrong. Yet I'm the stupid one here... ok. It is clear your mind is closed and you will play mental gynmastic games to help you keep your belief system.
Kevin Graham wrote:Now that William is losing yet another debate over at MADB, he wants to take desperate measures and throw down a formal debate challenge? This is just diversionary. If he cannot win a debate online, why would anyone think he can win a debate in a public setting? Andrew and Chris have exposed WIll the same way I have for years now. He is a know nothing.
Of course he is just bluffing the same way he bluffed with Metcalfe. He knows Chris will not debate him. William is a nobody. He's published nothing. He has no credibility among even the most loyal LDS believers. Debating him would be like Mitt Romney going out of his way to debate Michael Moore. Why would Chris want to put this on his resume before launching his academic career? He has tried to engage the LDS scholars since they are supposed to be on his level. Debating a blowhard Mormon apologist from the fringe is something he has tried to avoid but William keeps throwing himself at him in the most embarrassing ways. William is nothing more than John Gee's lapdog who is trying to but LDS scholars time with these silly diversions.
Enter, yet again, the least informed, least educated, least philosophically competent, and least intellectually ethical interlocutor among the entire posse.
There goes the neighborhood (and that's really saying something around here).
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us
- President Ezra Taft Benson
I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.
Droopy wrote:Enter, yet again, the least informed, least educated, least philosophically competent, and least intellectually ethical interlocutor among the entire posse.
There goes the neighborhood (and that's really saying something around here).
The fact that you, in almost ever post, need to use some variation of the word "intelligent" speaks volumes about your (thesaurus abusing) insecurities...Are you the by-product of LDS-forced-middle aged celibacy? I am sad for you....
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
The fact that you, in almost ever post, need to use some variation of the word "intelligent" speaks volumes about your (thesaurus abusing) insecurities...Are you the by-product of LDS-forced-middle aged celibacy? I am sad for you....
1. I don't do anything approaching that which you claim.
2. You are doing nothing more than a juvenile aping of a standard anti-Droopy stand-up comic routine that began long ago among a few posters here who apparently, continually flummoxed and threatened in their own intellectual self importance by my vocabulary and prose style, which, given the average seventh to eight grade reading comprehension and prose creativity levels around here, could, I understand, appear quite daunting, began to feel a bit put out and devised the continual thesaurus put down.
How did you get out of your crib, schreech?
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us
- President Ezra Taft Benson
I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.
Droopy wrote: 2. You are doing nothing more than a juvenile aping of a standard anti-Droopy stand-up comic routine that began long ago among a few posters here who apparently, continually flummoxed and threatened in their own intellectual self importance by my vocabulary and prose style, which, given the average seventh to eight grade reading comprehension and prose creativity levels around here, could, I understand, appear quite daunting, began to feel a bit put out and devised the continual thesaurus put down.
That was the stupidest, run-on sentance i have ever read....your tiny unused penis is influencing your nonsensical posts again...I also have to laugh at the fact that, somehow, you used the word "intellectual" in your post....insecure much?
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
That was the stupidest, run-on sentance i have ever read....your tiny unused penis is influencing your nonsensical posts again...I also have to laugh at the fact that, somehow, you used the word "intellectual" in your post....insecure much?
You didn't happen to post here about six years ago as "Cricket" did you?
Nothing is going to startle us more when we pass through the veil to the other side than to realize how well we know our Father [in Heaven] and how familiar his face is to us
- President Ezra Taft Benson
I am so old that I can remember when most of the people promoting race hate were white.
Droopy wrote:You didn't happen to post here about six years ago as "Cricket" did you?
No, and your posts are still completely idiotically-incoherent....next question?
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
I just perused the thread over at MAD and didn't see where Will threw down a challenge to debate. Instead, I see a lot of hilarious squirming from Will and his rat pack of ignorant followers. You know, the usual suspects (wade and Loran) who rush to his cheer-leading section every time he decides to come out of hiding and regurgitate his failed apologetic theories. The two who are among the most vocal, while least informed, on the subject at hand. I love the way Andrew has managed to mop the floors with Will in such a "kind" way as to avoid moderator intervention. When I tried to do this last week, I was suspended and my post removed. And then Will instantly shut down the thread. Funny that he is still trying to talk trash about this forum. The reason he remains at MAD is because is requires constant moderator intervention. He needs that edge if he hopes to have a chance of coming across as an expert. The rest of us who actually know these documents, just sit back and laugh at the way Will describes his apologetics as "persuasive" "compelling" and everything we say is "without evidence." It is almost as if he is hoping to win a debate by bludgeoning his audience with assertions. And now that his back is up against the wall, he is trying to lure Dan McClellan out of the wood works to help him out (Dan talked on an issue entirely irrelevant to the point of his OpEd!). He keeps linking everyone to an old thread here that took place over a year ago when Dan admittedly wasn't in a position to speak much on the matter since he had not examined the documents.
Ya gotta love this crew. They never fail to entertain.
Chris Smith should agree to debate Will on a MormonExpression podcast. Then Will can scurry away with his tail between his legs just like he did when Brent called his bluff.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
Dr. Shades wrote:Chris Smith should agree to debate Will on a MormonExpression podcast. Then Will can scurry away with his tail between his legs just like he did when Brent called his bluff.
He'll do so by insisting on particular conditions as he did with Brent. "I will only debate you, sir, if you wear a hat made of peanut butter!"
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist