Cherry-picking similarities a powerful way to mislead
So true.
It is (to coin a term) very "Niblish".
*cough*
Last edited by W3C [Validator] on Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
when believers want to give their claims more weight, they dress these claims up in scientific terms. When believers want to belittle atheism or secular humanism, they call it a "religion". -Beastie
yesterday's Mormon doctrine is today's Mormon folklore.-Buffalo
Vanka wrote: With all the "cherry-picking parallels" being used by FAIR, Maxwell Institute, and other apologists, Daniel Peterson has the gumption to call out an evangelical preacher for doing it?
Matt. 15:7-9
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Everybody Wang Chung wrote:Best comment to the article was:
Vanka wrote: With all the "cherry-picking parallels" being used by FAIR, Maxwell Institute, and other apologists, Daniel Peterson has the gumption to call out an evangelical preacher for doing it?
Matt. 15:7-9
Turning his criticisms on himself is not one of Danny's hobbies. Hypocrisy, however... that's one of his favorites!
God belief is for people who don't want to live life on the universe's terms.
This could have been an opportunity for bridge-building--an opportunity to explore the commonalities between Mormonism and Islam. Instead, the article seems an excuse to accuse an Evangelical critic of being dishonest.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
"Moses Middlebury" school of philology, according to which "Moses" and "Middlebury" are really the same name. You just have to drop the "-oses" and add the "-iddlebury."
This reminded me of NHM, just insert your favorite vowels.