Dr. DCP Discusses Dr. Scratch on the MAD Board

[_Some Schmo]

DCP has taken "pathetic" to a brand new low.

lol

[_KimberlyAnn]

I just read the pertinent thread over on Mormon Discussions and Dialogue.

My comment is for Alter Idem: I understand that your posting experience here may not have been entirely pleasant, but I enjoyed your participation a lot and hope that, if you can get your account glitch resolved, you'll visit every now and again.

Kimberly

[_stemelbow]

It's clear that DCP is still scouring this board, looking for any mention of him at all to complain about over there and play the martyr card he loves so much. A quote in a sig made by Will about Peterson from several years back is the best he could find. Maybe he's feeling neglected.

Its been noted elsewhere that the sigline has been in place for a month. DCP also noted elsewhere that the quote was made known to him by Will. Will subsequently denied being Wheat at all. It seems Peterson has accepted Will's claim. I don't care if Will is Wheat either. The deception is clearly Scratch's. This was from 3 years ago as you pointed out. He needed his Peterson fix and Schryver fix so he added it, apparently. You then complain about DCP for calling out Scratch's deception.

you guys...

[_Buffalo]

It's clear that DCP is still scouring this board, looking for any mention of him at all to complain about over there and play the martyr card he loves so much. A quote in a sig made by Will about Peterson from several years back is the best he could find. Maybe he's feeling neglected.

Its been noted elsewhere that the sigline has been in place for a month. DCP also noted elsewhere that the quote was made known to him by Will. Will subsequently denied being Wheat at all. It seems Peterson has accepted Will's claim. I don't care if Will is Wheat either. The deception is clearly Scratch's. This was from 3 years ago as you pointed out. He needed his Peterson fix and Schryver fix so he added it, apparently. You then complain about DCP for calling out Scratch's deception.

you guys...

It's a well-known fact that Schryver has had a lot of sock puppets but has never admitted to any of them. Again, Will made the quote that DCP finds so offensive. I suggest DCP take it to the party who actually made the statement, instead of finding yet another reason to whine about Scratch.

I quoted you in my sig for a while - you were grown up enough not to whine about it. A quote is a quote is a quote.

Daniel Peterson can leave MDB, but he can't leave it alone!

[_stemelbow]

It's a well-known fact that Schryver has had a lot of sock puppets but has never admitted to any of them.

Utter deflection. Who cares?

Again, Will made the quote that DCP finds so offensive. I suggest DCP take it to the party who actually made the statement, instead of finding yet another reason to whine about Scratch.

Peterson was told by Will that he (Will) did not author that, and that he was not Will. I don't see why Peterson would have any reason to doubt him. I realize you "know" it was Will. but Peterson does not and probably suspects it was not Will, for all we know.

I quoted you in my sig for a while - you were grown up enough not to whine about it. A quote is a quote is a quote.

Daniel Peterson can leave MDB, but he can't leave it alone!

That's just silly. Since he's left he's been mentioned many, many times--and most of those were for negative attacks. And yet, you want to go after him for not leaving this board alone? That's just silly.

[_sock puppet]

To spin it as though this is a negative to Peterson is just silly. He takes exception to be presented by someone as having violent desires for others. This personal attack from Scratch has gone on and continues to go on. Why is he not allowed to post things in hopes to correct Scratch's attempts to misrepresent him?

Do you know DCP personally? If so, please explain in detail the depth, breadth and length of your association with him.

If not, why do you assume it is "just silly" that DCP might be capable of violence?

Does DCP deny Will's having authored the passage quoted by Dr Scratch in his signature line?

Is DCP unable to put in his signature line any jocular context of Will's quote, to diffusing any "attack" quality its inclusion in Dr Scratch's siggy line might be?

Dr Scratch added the DCP quote to his signature line. He does not have to reaffirm that it is what he wants to publish as part of his signature line each time Dr Scratch logs on to MDB. So Dr Scratch is not 'continuing' the "attack".

Of course DCP is allowed to post things "in hopes to correct Scratch's attempts to misrepresent him", just as Dr Scratch is allowed to start a thread like this one pointing out what DCP has done elsewhere, revealing that DCP keeps a close, watchful eye on what's going on here and runs to the protection of Juliann's board to post his whiny ass complaining about it.

I am pleased Dr Scratch started this thread. It informs me that as much as DCP protests to the contrary, he does follow what goes on here and it gets his ire up.

[_Buffalo]

Peterson was told by Will that he (Will) did not author that, and that he was not Will. I don't see why Peterson would have any reason to doubt him. I realize you "know" it was Will. but Peterson does not and probably suspects it was not Will, for all we know.

Peterson probably knows it's Will. DCP openly said here that he thought that Will's last sock puppet (Nomad) here was really Will. He would never say anything like that on his home turf, though. What he says there and what he'll say here are two different things.

That's just silly. Since he's left he's been mentioned many, many times--and most of those were for negative attacks. And yet, you want to go after him for not leaving this board alone? That's just silly.

Not really. He was mentioned a lot at first, but it's been pretty quiet since then. Apparently he misses the attention.

[_Doctor CamNC4Me]

you guys...I fear you don't even realize what's going on due to your self-imposed blindness.

[_schreech]

oh.my.elohim

You do realize that, just because you choose to believe in Mormon fables, you don't need to automatically and blindly defend anything that is said by a self-proclaimed "defender" of mo'ism right? Are you hoping to get a MI gold star or something?

[_RockSlider]

I am pleased Dr Scratch started this thread. It informs me that as much as DCP protests to the contrary, he does follow what goes on here and it gets his ire up.

actually, scratch has only posted twice in this thread, neither of which were the OP

It will be interesting to see if Dan is pleased or displeased with Stem's sharing here.

for what it's worth, other than this whole signature stuff, it has appeared to me that scratch has stuck to his word on the retirement deal … with one of his posts here wondering if all this is an invitation to re-engage.

Good Lord, please … no.

Scratch, if you really want to get under Dan’s skin, replace the sig with something really nasty about MI, and keep with your retirement. Go after the establishments all you want, and avoid mention of Dan all together.

My guess it was your recent MI thread and your sticking to your word that is really bugging him. He needs a persecutor, even if he can only find it in a sig, and to be a hero as he points out all the evil and wrong you do him.