liz3564 wrote:Yes...great job on continuing to exploit a private board.
What, exactly, do you mean by "exploit"? I am not sure that word means what you think it means....
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
Liz wrote:Yes...great job on continuing to exploit a private board.
Sock Puppet wrote:Given all the tongue wagging from a "private" board directed at the posters on this public one, I am not sure who is exploiting the private board more.
I am the administrator of that private board. This thread has gone on for 8 pages, and this was my first comment.
Considering that Scratch has published whole cloth conversations from my board, which is private, are you saying that I don't have a right to be just a little upset by that?
I am also disappointed in the person who gave Scratch the information. He betrayed the trust of the members of my board in doing so. I have encouraged him to come forward to me privately, and I hope that he considers doing so.
liz3564 wrote:Yes...great job on continuing to exploit a private board.
What, exactly, do you mean by "exploit"? I am not sure that word means what you think it means....
The board was made private for a reason. The fact that anyone is posting whole cloth contents from it without the permission of the posters involved is just plain wrong. I don't care what you call it.
liz3564 wrote:I am the administrator of that private board. This thread has gone on for 8 pages, and this was my first comment.
Considering that Scratch has published whole cloth conversations from my board, which is private, are you saying that I don't have a right to be just a little upset by that?
I am also disappointed in the person who gave Scratch the information. He betrayed the trust of the members of my board in doing so. I have encouraged him to come forward to me privately, and I hope that he considers doing so.
It seems like maybe you should concentrate on the administration of that board, especially considering the members of that board seem to think disparaging the members of this board is acceptable (in not-so-private)...There seems to be a conflict of interest here (especially considering the fact that several of my posts about "that" board ended up being moved to the telestial forum as they did not reflect well on you....a moderator of both boards....) - just a thought.
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
I'm fairly new here and I still mainly just come on to read the topics and posts. So, I am not very familiar with the members here, their histories with each other and so on.
But just coming in cold here, it really strikes me as being odd that one of the moderators on this forum would break off and start their own "by invitation only" forum.
What is being discussed there that can't be discussed publicly on here? Why so exclusive and secretive?
liz3564 wrote:The board was made private for a reason. The fact that anyone is posting whole cloth contents from it without the permission of the posters involved is just plain wrong. I don't care what you call it.
Umm...what do you mean by "wrong"? Do you mean you don't like it? Do you mean that it makes the posters on that board look silly? Online "privacy" is a myth...
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
liz3564 wrote: I am also disappointed in the person who gave Scratch the information. He betrayed the trust of the members of my board in doing so. I have encouraged him to come forward to me privately, and I hope that he considers doing so.
Madison54 wrote:I'm fairly new here and I still mainly just come on to read the topics and posts. So, I am not very familiar with the members here, their histories with each other and so on.
But just coming in cold here, it really strikes me as being odd that one of the moderators on this forum would break off and start their own "by invitation only" forum.
What is being discussed there that can't be discussed publicly on here? Why so exclusive and secretive?
Hello, and welcome. :)
It's because this particular Moderator wanted to create a "dream team" of posters that only she likes in order to moderate the conversations to her satisfaction.
In other words, an echo chamber. - Dr. Cam
In the face of madness, rationality has no power - Xiao Wang, US historiographer, 2287 AD.
Every record...falsified, every book rewritten...every statue...has been renamed or torn down, every date...altered...the process is continuing...minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Ideology is always right.
Madison54 wrote:I'm fairly new here and I still mainly just come on to read the topics and posts. So, I am not very familiar with the members here, their histories with each other and so on.
But just coming in cold here, it really strikes me as being odd that one of the moderators on this forum would break off and start their own "by invitation only" forum.
What is being discussed there that can't be discussed publicly on here? Why so exclusive and secretive?
Hello, and welcome. :)
It's because this particular Moderator wanted to create a "dream team" of posters that only she likes in order to moderate the conversations to her satisfaction.
In other words, an echo chamber. - Dr. Cam
Ok....got it. Is she still going to continue being a moderator on this forum? It seems that what she did would sorely undermine her effectiveness or influence on this forum now. The whole thing just strikes me as being a crumby thing to do.
Maybe this is sour grapes because I wasn't invited to the new board ... but after quickly scanning the 1st page of this thread, I had the same question: what is all this for? And who needs it?
I did notice this little gem from DCP:
I'm tired of being the topic, myself. I'm tired of the personal criticisms from people who don't know me at all.
I wouldn't put up with such drivel in real life. I can't think of any real reason to keep coming back to a message board where it's a significant feature.
Dan and Stem; so different and yet so alike.
The person who is certain and who claims divine warrant for his certainty belongs now to the infancy of our species. Christopher Hitchens
Faith does not give you the answers, it just stops you asking the questions. Frater