A Meltdown of Epic Proportions

[_stemelbow]

One of the mods, dumb ass.

My goodness. Settle down why don'tcha? I see Jersey Girl here, which is an anonymous name. I do not see it there. I do see plenty of anonymous handles over there, but I would not know which one is Jersey Girl. Why would my question on that invoke such hostility? ah well...take care.

[_gramps]

One of the mods, dumb ass.

My goodness. Settle down why don'tcha? I see Jersey Girl here, which is an anonymous name. I do not see it there. I do see plenty of anonymous handles over there, but I would not know which one is Jersey Girl. Why would my question on that invoke such hostility? ah well...take care.

I am a lot like Dr. Peterson, always posting and chuckling at the same time. You have misinterpreted.

It is usually the person who calls another a goon that needs to settle down, no?

Why won't you man up and put the label to the poster?

You do know that the poster you are referring to also posts here, don't you?

[_stemelbow]

For integrity's sake the disparaging on this topic originated with Scratch.

[/quote]CFR, for integrity's sake, that is.[/quote]

Here's how it played out:

Scratch, as Liz confirmed, about a month ago dug up some three year old quote from some guy named Wheat who many here assume to be Will (which ought to, but probably won't, draw some suspicion of your use of the word "obsessive" in reference to Peterson while you let Scratch, and yourself, off the hook).

That quote spoke Peterson's name as one who promotes violence against some posters.

Will somehow saw the sig line and notified, somehow Peterson of it.

The sig line in Peterson's view, as he expressed on Liz's board and which is in public view now, was "false public slander". He felt he had the right to contradict that and to ask if the quote was authentic.

Anyway, I doubt you have to go anywhere to see how this all played out.

The disparaging began with none other than Scratch.

Thanks.

[_stemelbow]

I am a lot like Dr. Peterson, always posting and chuckling at the same time. You have misinterpreted.

It is usually the person who calls another a goon that needs to settle down, no?

Why won't you man up and put the label to the poster?

You do know that the poster you are referring to also posts here, don't you?

I called out the poster there, gramps. You seem to be attempting to make much ado about nothing. I'm thinking you probably are a lot like Dr. Peterson, but perhaps don't realize howso.

Take care.

[_gramps]

stemelbow wrote:

I'm thinking you probably are a lot like Dr. Peterson, but perhaps don't realize howso.

No, if your nose was as far up my butt as yours is up his, I would swat you away.

Or call the goon squad to take care of the job.

[_sock puppet]

For integrity's sake the disparaging on this topic originated with Scratch.

CFR, for integrity's sake, that is.[/quote]

Here's how it played out:

Scratch, as Liz confirmed, about a month ago dug up some three year old quote from some guy named Wheat who many here assume to be Will (which ought to, but probably won't, draw some suspicion of your use of the word "obsessive" in reference to Peterson while you let Scratch, and yourself, off the hook).

That quote spoke Peterson's name as one who promotes violence against some posters.

Will somehow saw the sig line and notified, somehow Peterson of it.

The sig line in Peterson's view, as he expressed on Liz's board and which is in public view now, was "false public slander". He felt he had the right to contradict that and to ask if the quote was authentic.

Anyway, I doubt you have to go anywhere to see how this all played out.

The disparaging began with none other than Scratch.

Thanks.[/quote]
Then for integrity's sake, it is clear that it all started with Wheat, your fellow believer. Or maybe, because Wheat's statement was based on an assault rifle one by Dan himself, well, now it's back at Dan's doorstep, isn't it?

[_Some Schmo]

Then for integrity's sake, it is clear that it all started with Wheat, your fellow believer. Or maybe, because Wheat's statement was based on an assault rifle one by Dan himself, well, now it's back at Dan's doorstep, isn't it?

I wonder why stem hasn't whined about Dan whining about Scratch. I guess his whining is reserved for exmos only. So much for integrity's sake. Ah well.

[_Jason Bourne]

I wasn't planning to address this, but I've thought better of it. I've been very "vocal" about this and I'm going to clearly state my position here as well.

If a person claims to leave a board because they aren't treated well, are attacked, find the posters intellectually inferior (pick one) then by gosh, leave it. I take exception to any poster who makes such claims and then goes about the business of dragging their baggage on to another board.

Liz created a nice board with a different focus. Mainly, for NOM's to share their experiences, give voice to their issues without being attacked for either being fence sitters or hypocrites. In my observation, NOM's are a distinct category of LDS who bring their own unique experiences/issues to the table. Essentially, they get it from both sides.

What I like about NOM's is that they think for themselves. They pick and choose what they are going to live for and go about the business of living it. They base their choices on their own personal values. No surprise that many of my good friends from the boards are NOM's. We have much in common in our approach to life and living it.

It's no secret that I dislike that (okay, I'm not going to be discreet) DCP dragged his baggage on to the Cafeteria. Please do not mistake this as support for Scratch or staunch opposition to DCP, for I have come to find qualities in both that I like. They each play a role in their online relationship and I essentially don't care about it.

I simply don't want to read about it on two boards.

What this has served to do is set up a relationship between MDB and the Cafeteria that is identical to MDB and MD&D. I don't think that this would have happened if a poster like DCP who claims to have left this board, actually left it instead of engaging it from afar.

Liz did not and does not deserve the mud that has been thrown on her in this thread. Someone to whom Liz extended a friendly invitation, chose to share the content of her board with Scratch. This disgusts me in a way that I find difficult to put into words.

I'll leave it at that for now.

Very well said my friend!

[_Jason Bourne]

Wow. Aren't you just the picture perfect example of a our Daughter in Heaven? When you pray at night do you explain to Jehovah & Elohim that you playfully engage in S&M fantasies and create contention amongst the Chosen?

Keep on rockin' that temple recommend Ms. Liz. You've really weasled you're way into it!

V/R
Dr. Cameron

Dude! Really? What is the burr up your bum over Liz about? I must have missed something along they way. Did she do something directly to you that causes you to be so flat out rotten towards her?

[_Yoda]

Wow. Aren't you just the picture perfect example of a our Daughter in Heaven? When you pray at night do you explain to Jehovah & Elohim that you playfully engage in S&M fantasies and create contention amongst the Chosen?

Keep on rockin' that temple recommend Ms. Liz. You've really weasled you're way into it!

V/R
Dr. Cameron

Dude! Really? What is the burr up your bum over Liz about? I must have missed something along they way. Did she do something directly to you that causes you to be so flat out rotten towards her?

Cam's burr up his butt has to do with the following:

1. He thinks I have moderated his posts unfairly, and that his suspensions in the past were unjustified. To this I say, too bad. Shades supported my decision. You want me removed as a Moderator? Take it up with Shades.

2. He thinks I'm a hypocrite. He is entitled to his opinion. I think he is an asshole. We are both entitled to our opinions.