Yahoo Bot wrote:You'd have to know Smoot to appreciate him. He wasn't active in the Church.
Reed Smoot the Mormon Apostle wasn't active in church? Okay.
Yahoo Bot wrote:You'd have to know Smoot to appreciate him. He wasn't active in the Church.
You'd have to know Smoot to appreciate him. He wasn't active in the Church.
karl61 wrote:Yahoo Bot wrote:You'd have to know Smoot to appreciate him. He wasn't active in the Church.
Reed Smoot the Mormon Apostle wasn't active in church? Okay.
KimberlyAnn wrote:Corporate greed is disturbing, yes, but Parental Greed is simply beyond the pale.
What are the odds that the older boy finds himself in Bloom's next edition of Genius?
;)
KA
sock puppet wrote:I'd say he was an inactive apostle, not an inactive Mormon. He attended Mormon Sunday services regularly in Washington DC while serving in the Senate. But what other Mormon apostle has snubbed attending a GC for secular purposes? I only know of Smoot doing so.
But aside from his level of activity in either capacity, I yet think he was lying to the Senate panel that questioned him about the oath of vengeance.
sock puppet wrote:I'd say he was an inactive apostle, not an inactive Mormon. He attended Mormon Sunday services regularly in Washington DC while serving in the Senate. But what other Mormon apostle has snubbed attending a GC for secular purposes? I only know of Smoot doing so. But aside from his level of activity in either capacity, I yet think he was lying to the Senate panel that questioned him about the oath of vengeance.
sock puppet wrote:Just wait until the press gets a hold of the fact that until about 1930, the temple ceremony made participants take a vow against the U.S. government.
harmony wrote:sock puppet wrote:Just wait until the press gets a hold of the fact that until about 1930, the temple ceremony made participants take a vow against the U.S. government.
I don't think the press is going to make a big deal about that, since it was 80 years ago. They'll find something more current... like the church meddling in politics in CA.