I'm a Woman?

[_Doctor Scratch]

Okay, look. I'll level with you: it's pointless to try and talk to you about this because you don't listen. I could lay out a whole bunch of reasons for you, and, just like Kishkumen said, you'll shrug your shoulders and say, "Well, the critics started it! If there were no critics, there would be no apologists!" So what's the point? You go right ahead and declare victory, Elder F. I'm sure you need it these days.

I understand your point, but would it be too much to ask to just humor me this time?

Yes, it would. I urge you to just go ahead and declare victory. Have fun with that. I hope you don't choke on it.

[_Simon Belmont]

Simon, no one likes answering the same questions over and over again, and, truth be told, your behavior is tedious.

When someone is on a five+ year crusade to destroy the reputation of someone else, and they continue in that tedium, then they should expect to be questioned on the justification of their words and deeds.

You can't possibly believe that a five-year crusade is sparked by one pronoun.

I don't believe that. I said things like that pronoun incident.

Yes, it would. I urge you to just go ahead and declare victory. Have fun with that. I hope you don't choke on it.

Why? If you're unwilling to justify your words and deeds, it makes is look as though you have no justification. Of course, I don't believe in many things that could justify a five+ year crusade to defame someone's good name, so it's logical to assume that it's highly unlikely you have such a justification.

[_Nightlion]

Scratch transcends gender.

Actually, all devils are ungendered according to my theology.

So is God. That is why they wanted to remain as they were.

So you think him a god or a devil?.....we know what he considers himself.

[_Kishkumen]

When someone is on a five+ year crusade to destroy the reputation of someone else, and they continue in that tedium, then they should expect to be questioned on the justification of their words and deeds.

I don't think you really understand what a serious attempt to destroy someone's reputation would look like. In fact, you have sometimes come closer to perpetrating that out of your dullard's clumsiness than Scratch has with Peterson.

I don't believe that. I said things like that pronoun incident.

Don't be so tediously literal, Simon. You know I didn't mean that literally.

[_Simon Belmont]

I don't think you really understand what a serious attempt to destroy someone's reputation would look like. In fact, you have sometimes come closer to perpetrating that out of your dullard's clumsiness than Scratch has with Peterson.

We're dealing with online pseudonyms here, Kishkumen. Anyone could say anything about "Scratch" or "Kishkumen" or "Rollo Tomasi" but it doesn't mean anything. Why? They're just false identities. When you verbally attack someone who posts under his real name, for five+ years, in public, you need a justification for it.

[_Kishkumen]

We're dealing with online pseudonyms here, Kishkumen. Anyone could say anything about "Scratch" or "Kishkumen" or "Rollo Tomasi" but it doesn't mean anything. Why? They're just false identities. When you verbally attack someone who posts under his real name, for five+ years, in public, you need a justification for it.

Yes, and you have sought to associate us with our real identities, have you not Simon? Don't play dumb here.

[_Simon Belmont]

Yes, and you have sought to associate us with our real identities, have you not Simon? Don't play dumb here.

To the extent that speculating that the other name you post under could be a real first name, yes. But that's not the point here. Whether I know anyone's real identity or not, I've never and would never do anything to defame, discredit, or destroy their reputation in any way.

So, for those who do choose to do such things (for five+ years) I simply ask: why?

It's a fair question. I said I would be fair with the answer. What's anonymous Scratch got to lose?

[_Kishkumen]

To the extent that speculating that the other name you post under could be a real first name, yes.

BS, you lying sack of crap. You know exactly who I am, and you have posted quotes of my online teaching evaluations. You are a moral pygmy and a liar.

Whether I know anyone's real identity or not, I've never and would never do anything to defame, discredit, or destroy their reputation in any way.

More lies.

It's a fair question. I said I would be fair with the answer. What's anonymous Scratch got to lose?

Simon, we're all three years old at some point in our lives, if we live that long. Then we learn that when people have answered the question, there is no need to keep asking it.

[_Doctor Scratch]

By reputation, Dan is a Middle Eastern scholar. as far as I know, I've had nothing but nice things to say about him in that regard.

[_Kishkumen]

Not to mention the fact that one does not aim to destroy the reputation of another person simply by criticizing on an "obscure board" the behavior they proudly parade in public.