ROFLCOPTER X10000000

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: ROFLCOPTER X10000000

Post by _schreech »

asbestosman wrote:I don't think it's considered pedophilia when you're 8 years old. I assume he was incarcerated as an adult. It makes me wonder why, if he started at 8, they didn't catch him doing dangerous stuff earlier and see warning signs before he did something worthy of a prison sentence. I mean, if it was just looking at a Playboy that's one thing. He's unlikely to go to prison for that. There's gotta be something very disturbing going on here. It's definitely not the normal reaction to porn. Then again, 8 seems a bit young for someone to be fascinated by skin mags. Maybe he was groomed by someone else?


I actually meant "was he into child porn as an adult thus landing him in prison" as I don't really see how porn can lead to a prison sentence, much like I can't understand how masturbation leads to homosexuality...
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: ROFLCOPTER X10000000

Post by _Buffalo »

quark wrote:They call it a drug so that means, as a drug, it should provide some medicinal benefits under certain contexts. I wonder what those might be?


Only when BYU prescribes it in their nutty Mengelesque experiments on gay students.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_quark
_Emeritus
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: ROFLCOPTER X10000000

Post by _quark »

I dunno Buffalo. I think you may have misrepresented this drug by defining the benefits so narrowly. Should we consult the experts first?
_quark
_Emeritus
Posts: 233
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:09 pm

Re: ROFLCOPTER X10000000

Post by _quark »

_brade
_Emeritus
Posts: 875
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 2:35 am

Re: ROFLCOPTER X10000000

Post by _brade »

schreech wrote:I think this explains it all:

Image


Image
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: ROFLCOPTER X10000000

Post by _schreech »

brade wrote:
schreech wrote:I think this explains it all:

Image


Image


Lol - that will haunt my dreams (and prevent me from watching porn for at least 2 days)...i was thinking of:

Image

but, just for your viewing enjoyment:

Image
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: ROFLCOPTER X10000000

Post by _moksha »

It began in Logan when four friends and business students at Utah State University got together one night in 2006 to discuss entrepreneurial endeavors. The conversation eventually turned to fighting pornography. Cam Lee, Clay Olsen, Ryan Werner and Beau Lewis started putting some ideas together.


Even organized as a charitable tax exempt organization, sufficient donations can make it a lucrative work program for young entreprenueurs. Apparently there is some money to be made in the anti-porn business.

Besides, what a remarkable cover for watching porn - so they will know what they are up against, of course. Just as long as they stay away from robot sex. A person would have to be pretty sick to take delight from all those attachments, nozzles and rheostats.

.

.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply