A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Daheshist
_Emeritus
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:17 am

A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Daheshist »

When I was an active Mormon, I was told that "true repentence" meant you MUST go through the Church Court process. You must confess to your bishop or branch president, and if you have committed sins worthy of excommunication, you must be excommunicated, then wait a year at least to be rebaptized, and another year before getting your Priesthood back. No...I never had a Church Court. I was "threatened" with a Court by Roy Doxey, who wanted me to "stop talking about Adam-God or else!" I said, "Else!" He called my bishop and said, "Excommunicate Darrick Evenson!" My bishop said, "Who are YOU? Are you my Stake President, or a Regional Rep? Who ARE you?" Doxey said, "I've been given authority by President Kimball!" My bishop said, "Ok, put that in a letter to my Stake President". Doxey said, "I can't! It's a secret! I wasn't even supposed to tell you that!" My bishop said, "Well, unless you can get a General Authority of Regional Rep to command me, a file leader, I can't to what you're asking me to do. What authority to YOU have over ME?" Doxey hung up.

Doxey was appointed to a secret committee later called Stregthen the Faith of the Members Committee, whose job it was to "seek and destroy" any Member deeded "heretical"; usually polygamists. I had written a paper called "The Truth About Adam-God" and put forth that Brigham Young did teach that Adam was Michael the HOLY GHOST and that Adam was the Father of our spirits, Jehovah the Grand-father, and Elohim the Great-grand-father. BY did teach these things, as a Revelation of God and official Church doctrine. The Church wanted this COVERED-UP as the Church is now trying to cover-up the Curse of Cain teachings. So, they secretly appointed Doxey to "seek out" all heretics and have them excommunicated if they did not "repent". I did not "repent". I was not a polygamist, nor "One Mighty and Strong". I was simply telling the TRUTH about what Brigham Young taught. The Church wanted it covered-up (as usual).

Richard Gordon Hinckley has NEVER been excommunicated. He never had a Church Court. Yet, in 1968-1970, while an active Member, a returned missionary, he had affairs with other men, and also used prostitutes, male and female, while he worked at a car lot as a salesman, during the Summers while he attended Stanford University in California during the school year. When his father, Gordon B., found out, he excommunicated one of Richard's lovers, a man named Charles Van Damme. Richard Hinckley should have been EXCOMMUNICATED, but he never had even a Church Court. Gordon B. made sure of that. Richard went on to become a bishop (twice), a Stake President, a Mission President, and a member of the Third Quorum. "Rumor" is that Gordon wanted his son to become an Apostle, but that Gordon's counsellors objected vehemently, so Gordon made Richard a Seventy instead:


At the April 2005 general conference of the church, Hinckley was accepted by the church as a member of the First Quorum of the Seventy. His father, who was President of the Church at the time, preemptively disavowed any involvement his son's calling in a sermon given later that day:

GBH: "I make it clear that I did not advance his name. That was done by others whose right it was to do so. I feel extremely sensitive about the matter of nepotism. As the lawyers say, I recused myself from participating. However, I believe he is worthy and qualified in every respect. In the first place, he had a great and wonderful mother. I wish I could recommend his father.
I mention this only because of my sensitivity concerning the matter of nepotism. Please do not hold it against him for his relationship to me. He’s powerless to help it."

When Richard Hinckley delivered his first general conference sermon a year later, he joked that he "was likely the only General Authority in the history of the Church to be sustained by the members in spite of a disclaimer by the prophet!"

On October 1, 2011, Hinckley was released from the First Quorum of the Seventy and given general authority emeritus status at the LDS Church's semi-annual general conference.[

Richard Hinckley has never "repented" according to Church Doctrine and Policy, because he never had a Church Court. Of course not, he was the son of an Apostle.

P.S. Jerald Tanner also knew this, and I "assume" he told his wife who "Elder Accused" was, but maybe he didn't. Richard G. Hinckley can SUE me, in fact, I invite him to do so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read my post in "Off -Topic" about the miracles of Dr. Dahesh. Abu Hussein, a Lebanese man, talks on camera about two supernatural miracles he witnessed personally.
Last edited by Guest on Thu Nov 24, 2011 12:20 am, edited 3 times in total.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Who is/was Roy Doxey, and what was his position in the church at the time of your run-in with him?
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Yahoo Bot
_Emeritus
Posts: 3219
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:37 pm

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Yahoo Bot »

Get your Van Dam story correct. Wrong Hinckley.
http://utlm.org/newsletters/no84.htm. Van Dam claimed that Gordon was his homosexual lover, not Richard. This is a well known attack on President Hinckley and you've garbled it.

I've seen you post this slur against Richard elsewhere and you can't keep your story consistent. It is easy to detect your posts because you consistently misspell Van Dam's name the same way.

Who are you, the next Kevin Graham?
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Kishkumen »

All I have to say about this thread is this: I don't care.

Let God be the judge.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Chap »

Yahoo Bot wrote:Who are you, the next Kevin Graham?


If only ...
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Kishkumen
_Emeritus
Posts: 21373
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00 pm

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Kishkumen »

Chap wrote:
Yahoo Bot wrote:Who are you, the next Kevin Graham?


If only ...


No kidding.

And may Yahoo Bot be the next Kerry Shirts.

Meaning a decent guy who is both entertaining and never shows up on this board.

I'd be happy enough with the first two qualities.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist
_Daheshist
_Emeritus
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:17 am

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Daheshist »

Roy Doxey was a BYU religion professor for many years, and he was known to be very "orthodox" and very anti-intellectual. They called him "Roy Orthodoxey". During this incident in 1981, he was working on the Strengthen the Faith of the Members Committee, at that time a secret committee, who were "SUPPOSED" to help Members who had trouble with anti-Mormon things but in reality all they did was "seek out and destroy" anyone in the Church who had heretical views. I wrote a paper "The Truth About Adam-God" naiively thinking it would help the Church answer the anti-Mormon Adam-God claim. HOw STUPID I was!!!! The Church was HIDING the Adam-God legacy, not "dealing" with it.

Every other week somebody calls the First Presidency, or writes them, saying "I AM THE ONE MIGHTY AND STRONG" and spouts the Adam-God stuff, so, naturally, Doxey concluded I was claiming this (which I was not). As any Mormon, Doxey JUDGED before he got all the facts.

My bishop did not "obey" Doxey, because he never heard of the Committee! And Doxey was not his file-leader in the priesthood.


Dr. Shades wrote:Who is/was Roy Doxey, and what was his position in the church at the time of your run-in with him?
_Daheshist
_Emeritus
Posts: 702
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:17 am

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Daheshist »

Van Damme was in a state of dimentia when Decker and other anti-Mormons discovered him. He was discovered first by Doug Wallace, Decker's attorney in Utah. Richard G. went by "Gordon" with his gay and prostitute friends, and their black pimp. They knew him as Gordon. The Anti-Mormons told Van Damme that Richard's (whom they knew as Gordon) name was Gordon B. Hinckley. They lied to them, because they needed them to say on film that "Gordon B. Hinckley" was the hypocrite. They could not sell videos saying the truth: that it was his son Richard. That would not sell videos.

I have the correct spelling, it was Jerald Tanner who got it wrong.

Richard G. Decker "may" have truly repented since 1970, but........the sons of Apostles should not have "special" treatment, and Richard should have been excommunicated. You would have been. I would have been, if it would have been you or me.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Daheshist wrote:My bishop did not "obey" Doxey, because he never heard of the Committee! And Doxey was not his file-leader in the priesthood.

In that case, hats off to your former bishop!
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: A Call for the Excommunication of Richard G. Hinckley

Post by _harmony »

Daheshist wrote:Richard G. Decker "may" have truly repented since 1970, but........the sons of Apostles should not have "special" treatment, and Richard should have been excommunicated. You would have been. I would have been, if it would have been you or me.


Another Mormon Royalty perk, maybe?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply