I'm a Woman?

[_Drifting]

That was poorly stated. A negative coming from DCP's participation in this whole Scrach affair, as much as anything, is that other people tend to assign negative motives to DCP. They don't let him speak on the why's or what's. They know his reasons better than he does.

Okay, got it.

I think people fill in the vacuum left when DCP avoids answering reasonable questions and instead runs away to other boards where he is equally mean spirited.

[_sock puppet]

It does seem to me that part of hte problem with DCP even giving any of this time is other's tend to go after him by assigned unpleasant motives to him.

What?

That was poorly stated. A negative coming from DCP's participation in this whole Scrach affair, as much as anything, is that other people tend to assign negative motives to DCP. They don't let him speak on the why's or what's. They know his reasons better than he does.

Are DCP's typing fingers broke? Is he limited to so many posts or words he can post?

When DCP claims that he doesn't bother even reading MDB, but his posts at MD&D or thecafeteria show that he has been looking here (such as to notice Dr Scratch's signature line), you think it is unbecoming that others will call DCP out on his obvious misrepresentation about not looking here? DCP has not been forthcoming and honest in many of the things has posted. Take for example the 2nd Watson Letter fiasco from December 2009. On MAD, DCP had fabricated an entire tale, having held in his own two little hands and looked and saw with his own two little eyes a letter he said was on FP letterhead and signed by FP Secretary Michael Watson retracting the earlier letter, the actual one that Watson had so sent to an Oklahoma bishop on where the Book of Mormon's Hill Cumorah is located. DCP insisted having seen the FP letterheaded and Watson signed retraction letter. DCP even dragged 6 of his NAMIRS compatriots by naming them into this charade. When it was discovered that the so-called retraction was not on FP letterhead, not signed, and sent by a staffer, not the official Secretary to the FP and beastie gave him an out, suggesting that it might be that his memory playing tricks on him given that it was 16 years earlier, the Bellicose One insisted that his memory was correct, that his memory is infallible. But of course, within a week of seeing the actual, unsigned Carla Ogden Fax (a.k.a. the 2nd Watson Letter), the Bellicose One dropped his protestations without conceding a thing. And so, of course, he is an untouchable to you DCP sycophants. Who would dare to question the great and powerful DCP?

[_stemelbow]

Are DCP's typing fingers broke? Is he limited to so many posts or words he can post?

Apparently you missed my point. He has spoken and after he has spoken others, perhaps like you, tend to discount his view and replace it with some speculation that he really must be responding to Scrach's attacks because he's bad for some reason or another.

[qote]When DCP claims that he doesn't bother even reading MDB, but his posts at MD&D or thecafeteria show that he has been looking here (such as to notice Dr Scratch's signature line), you think it is unbecoming that others will call DCP out on his obvious misrepresentation about not looking here?[/quote]

Oh brother. You're bringin this up again? As it was Scratch had the sig line for amonth before DCP commented on another board. And when he did he said he was notified of the sig line. Your example only illustrates my point--you have attributed to somethign that is simply not true.

DCP has not been forthcoming and honest in many of the things has posted. Take for example the 2nd Watson Letter fiasco from December 2009. On MAD, DCP had fabricated an entire tale, having held in his own two little hands and looked and saw with his own two little eyes a letter he said was on FP letterhead and signed by FP Secretary Michael Watson retracting the earlier letter, the actual one that Watson had so sent to an Oklahoma bishop on where the Book of Mormon's Hill Cumorah is located. DCP insisted having seen the FP letterheaded and Watson signed retraction letter. DCP even dragged 6 of his NAMIRS compatriots by naming them into this charade. When it was discovered that the so-called retraction was not on FP letterhead, not signed, and sent by a staffer, not the official Secretary to the FP. When beastie gave him an out, that it might be that his memory playing tricks on him given that it was 16 years earlier, the Bellicose One insisted that his memory was correct, that his memory is infallible. But of course, within a week of seeing the actual, unsigned Carla Ogden Fax (a.k.a. the 2nd Watson Letter), the Bellicose One dropped his protestations without conceding a thing. And so, of course, he is an untouchable to you DCP sycophants. Who would dare to question the great and powerful DCP?

What the hell? I was not here in 2009. I can't speak to that. I don't even care anyway. I'm not a DCP sychophant. But, my goodness you seem awfully angry at him, as if he's been toilet papering your house every weekend over the past 2 years or something.

[_sock puppet]

Are DCP's typing fingers broke? Is he limited to so many posts or words he can post?

Apparently you missed my point. He has spoken and after he has spoken others, perhaps like you, tend to discount his view and replace it with some speculation that he really must be responding to Scrach's attacks because he's bad for some reason or another.

[qote]When DCP claims that he doesn't bother even reading MDB, but his posts at MD&D or thecafeteria show that he has been looking here (such as to notice Dr Scratch's signature line), you think it is unbecoming that others will call DCP out on his obvious misrepresentation about not looking here?

Oh brother. You're bringin this up again? As it was Scratch had the sig line for amonth before DCP commented on another board. And when he did he said he was notified of the sig line. Your example only illustrates my point--you have attributed to somethign that is simply not true.

DCP has not been forthcoming and honest in many of the things has posted. Take for example the 2nd Watson Letter fiasco from December 2009. On MAD, DCP had fabricated an entire tale, having held in his own two little hands and looked and saw with his own two little eyes a letter he said was on FP letterhead and signed by FP Secretary Michael Watson retracting the earlier letter, the actual one that Watson had so sent to an Oklahoma bishop on where the Book of Mormon's Hill Cumorah is located. DCP insisted having seen the FP letterheaded and Watson signed retraction letter. DCP even dragged 6 of his NAMIRS compatriots by naming them into this charade. When it was discovered that the so-called retraction was not on FP letterhead, not signed, and sent by a staffer, not the official Secretary to the FP. When beastie gave him an out, that it might be that his memory playing tricks on him given that it was 16 years earlier, the Bellicose One insisted that his memory was correct, that his memory is infallible. But of course, within a week of seeing the actual, unsigned Carla Ogden Fax (a.k.a. the 2nd Watson Letter), the Bellicose One dropped his protestations without conceding a thing. And so, of course, he is an untouchable to you DCP sycophants. Who would dare to question the great and powerful DCP?

What the hell? I was not here in 2009. I can't speak to that. I don't even care anyway. I'm not a DCP sychophant. But, my goodness you seem awfully angry at him, as if he's been toilet papering your house every weekend over the past 2 years or something.[/quote]

Yes, it must be anger, and not my memory, that caused me to think of this episode two years later and post it. What ever my 'motives' in posting it, have you checked the facts? You might want to go to MD&D and see if they have not purged the Bellicose One's postings in that thread. Read up. Find out about this one that you defend at the drop of a hat.

[_beastie]

That's a pretty unfair characterization on it all. I think DCP's stated position on why he responds is so the slew of personal attacks and attempts to assassinate his character are refuted. If unchallenged whose to say some of the attacks and allegations aren't accepted by more people.

It does seem to me that part of hte problem with DCP even giving any of this time is other's tend to go after him by assigned unpleasant motives to him. I've told him before to just ignore Scratch.

The difference between you and me is that you think DCP is stupid. I don't.

[_stemelbow]

Yes, it must be anger, and not my memory, that caused me to think of this episode two years later and post it. What ever my 'motives' in posting it, have you checked the facts? You might want to go to MD&D and see if they have not purged the Bellicose One's postings in that thread. Read up. Find out about this one that you defend at the drop of a hat.

I'm saying you seem angry. I don't know your motives at all. You ahven't stated them. Who cares if DCP was wrong 2 years ago? Or who cares if he lied 2 years ago? I know I don't. I'm thinking you've lied at some point in the past 2 years too. What does it matter to you? It seems like you are unnecessarily hostile to him. that's all.

[_stemelbow]

The difference between you and me is that you think DCP is stupid. I don't.

Well there's more of a difference than that. For instance, you're a female, right? But oh well. I think even the brightest amongst can be pretty stupid about things. I don't know what that has to do with what I said, but so be it. You don't think DCP is stupid. I'll make that note. And just to clarify, neither do I.

[_sock puppet]

Yes, it must be anger, and not my memory, that caused me to think of this episode two years later and post it. What ever my 'motives' in posting it, have you checked the facts? You might want to go to MD&D and see if they have not purged the Bellicose One's postings in that thread. Read up. Find out about this one that you defend at the drop of a hat.

I'm saying you seem angry. I don't know your motives at all. You ahven't stated them. Who cares if DCP was wrong 2 years ago? Or who cares if he lied 2 years ago? I know I don't. I'm thinking you've lied at some point in the past 2 years too. What does it matter to you? It seems like you are unnecessarily hostile to him. that's all.

So are you self-appointing yourself the Czar of the Bureau of Appropriate Levels of Hostility and suggesting we should have our posts vetted through you to make sure they do not exceed your sense of what level of hostility is appropriate before we post them?

[_sock puppet]

The difference between you and me is that you think DCP is stupid. I don't.

Well there's more of a difference than that. For instance, you're a female, right? But oh well. I think even the brightest amongst can be pretty stupid about things. I don't know what that has to do with what I said, but so be it. You don't think DCP is stupid. I'll make that note. And just to clarify, neither do I.

Then maybe you ought to stop posting statements that belie that clarification.

[_sock puppet]

I'm saying you seem angry.

And DCP seems duplicitous and dishonest.

See how that works?