Daheshist wrote: The Brethren cover-up for their wayward blood relatives all the time! All...the...time!
You sound astounded... outraged... surprised.
Why?
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
It does not matter one iota if Richard G. Hinckley has "repented" since 1970! The point is...I was told as a young Mormons that to "repent" one MUST CONFESS to one's bishop, and have a Church Court if the offense warrants a court. Now, R.G. was endowed, married in the Temple, a returned missionary, and held some Church calling, when he had male lovers and was using male and female prostitutes in Salt Lake City. I HEARD this many years ago, but only after a LOT of personal research, did I discover it was 100% true. I would not publish it otherwise.
Gordon B. Hinckley deliberately BROKE Church policy, gave special treatment to his son. That is NOT right! There is no Mormon statute of limitations. He needs to have a Church Court!!!