Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_schreech
_Emeritus
Posts: 2470
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 3:49 pm

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _schreech »

Mattie wrote:It's obvious that "stemelbow" is just a sockpuppet you people use to make it seem like TBMs are all dim-witted and gullible, etc.

You're a twisted bunch.


Image

I.am.speechless..."dim-witted"...I think my irony meter just a-sploded....
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents
"I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs
_Yoda

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Yoda »

Morley wrote:
Mattie wrote:It's obvious that "stemelbow" is just a sockpuppet you people use to make it seem like TBMs are all dim-witted and gullible, etc.

You're a twisted bunch.

Where the hell do you get off with this crap?


Agreed. I can assure you that Stem is a real person.

What is your problem?
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Quasimodo »

Mattie wrote:It's obvious that "stemelbow" is just a sockpuppet you people use to make it seem like TBMs are all dim-witted and gullible, etc.

You're a twisted bunch.


One never knows, but I'm pretty sure that Stem is not a sock puppet (I'm not so sure about you, however).

If you are saying that the avatar Stem is dim witted or gullible, you are mistaken. His posts are quite bright.

You should read along a little before you make silly accusations.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Quasimodo »

Why hasn't Stem showed up to make a comment?
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Buffalo »

Mattie wrote:It's obvious that "stemelbow" is just a sockpuppet you people use to make it seem like TBMs are all dim-witted and gullible, etc.

You're a twisted bunch.


Okay, now you've been outed. Whose sock puppet are you? Darth J? :D
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Mattie
_Emeritus
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:18 pm

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Mattie »

liz3564 wrote:
Agreed. I can assure you that Stem is a real person.


A real person pretending to be someone else?

If stemelbow is a real TBM, then I sincerely apologize for calling him/her dim-witted. But I think it's a sock puppet. If it's not, then he should find a new hobby.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Quasimodo »

Mattie wrote:A real person pretending to be someone else?

If stemelbow is a real TBM, then I sincerely apologize for calling him/her dim-witted. But I think it's a sock puppet. If it's not, then he should find a new hobby.


Ooo! Now I'm really wondering. Who's sock puppet are you? If I had to bet, I would say Stemelbow. What fun! A new game. "Who is Mattie?"

How about it, Stem. Is that you?

Anyone else have a guess?
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Morley »

Wow. Stem does not deserve this.

Mattie, I know you're trying to do what you think is best. Please go back and read Stemelbow's posts from the beginning of his history here. Under the "ah shucks," he's anything but dim-witted.

Though I become frustrated with him, I consider Stem something of a friend.

----

Edit: I apologize for my screed on this thread. For more than a decade, I was a public school teacher and, among other things, worked with developmentally disabled children. It's a complicated issue and a hot button one for me. That's not an excuse, just an explanation.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Blixa »

Lol. Mattie as a sock. It all makes sense now.
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: Schryver's Article Is Going To Be Published, Somewhere?

Post by _Quasimodo »

Everybody Wang Chung wrote:
It's also interesting that Schryver won't tell anyone where it's going to be published. Any bets? Will, why not tell us?


I'm feeling a little bad about the derail. As an apology to Everybody Wang Chung I'll answer part of the OP.

I think Schryver will either have to self publish or find a publication that will accept his paper with what must be some questionable research. National Enquirer?
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
Post Reply