
The word being shouted here by General Cambronne at the English troops demanding his surrender was said to have been 'merde'.
But maybe he didn't even manage that ...
bcspace wrote:Virtually every critcism of the Church has been explained, debunked, or rendered valueless by Mormon Apologetics in the intellectualy honest sense. All that remains is to repeat ourselves ad infinitum in response to the same old chestnuts until you guys can come up with something new and unrecycled.
To take an example from history, I think that from the examples on this board they are more or less at this stage…
bcspace wrote:Virtually every critcism of the Church has been explained, debunked, or rendered valueless by Mormon Apologetics in the intellectualy honest sense. All that remains is to repeat ourselves ad infinitum in response to the same old chestnuts until you guys can come up with something new and unrecycled.
Drifting wrote:I think the two next Mopologetic traumas will be how to explain how the Church was never against same sex marriages and how the Church always intended giving the women the Priestesshood.
Chap wrote:To draw a comparison from history, I think that if we judge from the examples on this board it would seem that they are more or less at this stage:
The word being shouted here by General Cambronne at the English troops demanding his surrender was said to have been 'merde'.
But maybe he didn't even manage that ...
Chap wrote:(I wonder how Belmont thinks that words get into dictionaries?)
Darth J wrote:Whereas "Internet anti-Mormonism" is a real term, with a precise definition, that does not vary from one proponent of the Church to the next.
Simon Belmont wrote:Darth J wrote:Whereas "Internet anti-Mormonism" is a real term, with a precise definition, that does not vary from one proponent of the Church to the next.
I'm sorry that you don't know what the term Internet means, DJ, but I can't say it surprises me. Here are a couple of starting places, so that you can get up to speed with the rest of humanity:
http://www.walthowe.com/navnet/history.html
http://www.davesite.com/webstation/net-history1.shtml
I'm sorry that you don't know what the prefix anti means, DJ, but I can't say it surprises me. Here are a couple of starting places, so that you can get up to speed with the rest of humanity:
http://www.virtualsalt.com/roots.htm (look about hald-way down the page)
Perhaps Chap wrote this next link, with his known interest in the collaborative Wiktionary, it would not surprise me:
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anti-
I'm sorry that you don't know what the term Mormon means, DJ, but I can't say it surprises me. Here are a couple of starting places, so that you can get up to speed with the rest of humanity:
http://www.Mormon.org
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Mormon
I hope these will help you better understand some of the basic words people use.
Darth J wrote:Is it pretty standard when you are taking graduate-level courses in philosophy for people not to understand that taking disparate words and combining them creates a unique terminology apart from the etymology of the component words?