stemelbow wrote:Well, your point seems to have been disproven by a simple search provided by myself and Just me. "Constant emphasis" would have to be a deceptive way to put it. I"m not even arguing the guilt doesn't have its place and is not something LDS see importance in at all. I'm just plain saying there is deception being presented in this thread and someone ought to acknowledge it.
You think I'm being deceptive? In what way? In my experience, there is constant emphasis on guilt, and I think a lot of Mormons would agree with me. You know, I have no problem with you disagreeing with me, and I've tried hard to explain my perspective here, even though you accused me of not addressing your comments--so again, I tried to explain and clarify. But I must say I'm taken aback that you think I'm presenting deception simply for presenting my opinion and experience. I don't know how to respond to that.
It just seems like too round of numbers and too agenda driven to actually buy what he's saying for me. it could be true, but I don't think it matters.
Again, this was part of his comments, not his study. That his anecdotal evidence coincides with his statistical evidence isn't surprising.
Sheesh…What does this even matter? Perhaps my ward in particular is full of a bunch of outliers? Who cares right? Is your point to say that Mormons are bad, Mormons are just like the rest of religious folks, or guilty Mormons are liars?
You asked me a question, and I answered it. Answering a question does not mean that I think Mormons are bad, like everyone else, or liars. Where is this coming from, stem?
I don’t think you are right. Which evangelical group places emphasis on works as a part of salvation as much as Mormons?
To me, that's a doctrinal issue, not one of standards. And I think you've hit the nail on the head: it's the emphasis on works in salvation that leads to the excessive guilt. Just my opinion, not trying to deceive.
I do still feel like I’m being talked at rather than having some sort of discussion. I mean you are the one who is saying they have higher standards. How are you defining this? Why do they have higher standards because of their dance restriction? That may not be a higher standard of anything other than craziness.
I am defining standards as the church defines them. Generally, "standards" in the church mean acceptable behaviors (hence, our ward's upcoming standards night, which our bishop informed us will be about sexual behavior, mostly). It's acceptable in the LDS church to dance, kiss, date without a chaperone, etc. Religions that don't accept such behavior can be said to have higher standards. Certainly, Islam has higher standard of modest dress than does Mormonism. I don't think this is saying anything controversial.
I'm sorry you are reading deception and hostility into my comments, which were not intended.