That is laughable. I'm pretty sure people can think about sex even when the other person is fully dressed.
Yes they can. So can a state of undress enhance sexual attraction? Under what conditions should sexual attraction be enhanced? What about the claim of the video in the OP about the effect on a man's mind? Supposedly there is some research behind it.
Now you're back to denying that sexual attraction does not exist.
Of course it exists. You're responsible for your own thoughts, though.
Amen. So stop saying a woman (or a man) bears no responsibility for their controllable effect on others.
bcspace, as you're sitting in your bathroom stroking your priesthood and thinking about that girl you saw at the gym with the amazing butt, do feel like god will give her a share of the punishment for your clandestine self-abuse? Does that make you feel a little less guilty?
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
I think the problem is BC Space has never caused a woman to feel sexually aroused, so he doesn't understand how hard it is to control other people's sexual urges toward you.
I'm sure my wife would disabuse you of that notion. But ad hom by you and buffalo merely show that you know I'm right but don't want to admit it.
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden ~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
bcspace wrote: This is a great thread because we are finding out that a lot of people think they can do what they want and have no effect. A sad state of affairs and a warning to us all.
What do you mean? People do what they want without having an effect?
BC, do you always think about sex when you see a women in a bikini?
Most the time I just think about how attractive the women is and my thoughts really aren't me picturing myself having sex with her.
If I see an attractive girl in a bikini then I am cool with that and if I see and attractive girl in jeans then that is cool too.
bcspace wrote:Laughable. You never heard the Church say that though.
Didn't say I had.
This is a great thread because we are finding out that a lot of people think they can do what they want and have no effect. A sad state of affairs and a warning to us all.
I think it's more a warning to you that you shouldn't distort other people's positions just to score rhetorical points. It's not becoming of you.
I think the problem is BC Space has never caused a woman to feel sexually aroused, so he doesn't understand how hard it is to control other people's sexual urges toward you.
I'm sure my wife would disabuse you of that notion. But ad hom by you and buffalo merely show that you know I'm right but don't want to admit it.
Some day I hope you can take personal responsibility for your own transgressions and stop blaming your perversion and lusts on others. :(
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
bcspace wrote:So what all of you are saying is that a woman, scandalously dressed, has absolutely no effect on anyone else and has played no role if someone else is sexually attracted to her?
You are the only one idiotic enough to equate sexual attraction with rape-ability....You are a creepy idiot who can't seem to understand that a provocatively dressed woman is not more deserving of rape. You are a perverted areshole and people, like myself, who have daughters, worry about people like you who seem to be unable to understand that women who dress "provocatively" (or in bathing suits??) are not trying to send you a "message"...Again, maybe you need to work out your sexual frustrations with your wife before you project your puritanical, sexual issues on other people...
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"your reasoning that children should be experimented upon to justify a political agenda..is tantamount to the Nazi justification for experimenting on human beings."-SUBgenius on gay parents "I've stated over and over again on this forum and fully accept that I'm a bigot..." - ldsfaqs