Kishkumen wrote:My interest in most apologetic and critical work on the Book of Abraham is for entertainment only, and Will is certainly a source of entertainment in sort of a train wreck reality show kind of way.
I enjoy a good critical assessment of the Book of Abraham, and the KEPs, as this is an area that has to deal with an area of enlightenment that was unknown at the time of the 're-discovery'. I also like to see the apologists try to spin the 'extant' portions into something that has Egyptologists spinning on the floor.
Kishkumen wrote:Indeed. Someone out there is looking for a Jesse Ventura of LDS apologetics and I think he is eminently qualified for that role. I wish him the greatest success. I can think of few things more gratifying than watching William Schryver become an apologetic celebrity to outshine the rest of the field and turn it into a real personal money-making enterprise. I see books, films, soundtracks, tours, paid lectures, the whole Megillah.
I'm sure they do, but I don't think Will is really the person they want. in my opinion, he's bought into his own persona, and thinks the backslapping that could be going on is genuine. I noticed that DCP never stepped in to endorse or admonish - tainted goods are tainted goods - and I wouldn't think he would want to be dragged into something like that. I'm sure it is the general feeling that he could be a liability, but spun out in the correct way, he could be a poster boy for apologetics. That begs the question, do they want to have the new boy out there?
I'd really like to know who he's got lined up for publication, and if they are aware of the potential backlash that could follow.