Safe amongst his people, Schryver wrote:In the way of news: I have, in the past few days, completed the initial drafts of two articles that address major shortcomings in the Hauglid analysis (sparse as it was) of the Abraham manuscripts. I have commenced a much longer third article that will simultaneously address another important shortcoming in the Hauglid analysis of the Abraham manuscripts, and also constitute a comprehensive critique of the 2010 JWHA Christopher Smith paper: The Dependence of Abraham 1:1-3 on the Egyptian Alphabet and Grammar.
Barring any unforeseen complications, all three articles will be published during the first half of 2012
Kishkumen wrote:Funny how his articles are addressed squarely to the people whom he perceives to be his enemies. No one could have foreseen that twist.
How can Hauglid be his enemy? Surely they play for the same team.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
I look forward to his announcement of the second draft of the semi-final-pre-edited-post spell checked-partially completed trial electronic version of the final uncensored preliminary edition that is being withheld due to the evil attention it is getting from the board that must not be named and will only be sent to those worthy of such a magnum opus.
"Any over-ritualized religion since the dawn of time can make its priests say yes, we know, it is rotten, and hard luck, but just do as we say, keep at the ritual, stick it out, give us your money and you'll end up with the angels in heaven for evermore."
Kishkumen wrote:Funny how his articles are addressed squarely to the people whom he perceives to be his enemies. No one could have foreseen that twist.
How can Hauglid be his enemy? Surely they play for the same team.
Slightly O/T,, but from the same thread 'over there'
Stroking Will's massive ego, Mr Englund wrote:Besides, I would be doing my opponents a disservice if I didn't challenge there ideas and correct there mistakes, just as they have done with me and mine.
I'm rather tempted to sign up just to tell him it's their ideas and their mistakes.
But that would just be petty.
Last edited by Guest on Wed Dec 14, 2011 3:11 am, edited 2 times in total.
Kishkumen wrote:Funny how his articles are addressed squarely to the people whom he perceives to be his enemies. No one could have foreseen that twist.
How can Hauglid be his enemy? Surely they play for the same team.
Will is convinced that there are false friends of the Restoration, or at least sadly mistaken ones, among the BYU folk and the apologists. Bokovoy, Hauglid, and Hodges are among their number, in Will's narcissistic imagination. Really, they simply don't agree with him. But to Will that is practically tantamount to being an enemy of God.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist