Schryver in 2012 perhaps?

[_Melchett]

Good decision. You should know that Wade has a learning disability.

Not mocking Wade's learning disability. I just saw some irony, that's all.

[_Kishkumen]

Good decision. You should know that Wade has a learning disability.

Not mocking Wade's learning disability. I just saw some irony, that's all.

Oh, I know you wouldn't do that. Unfortunately, I have. So, I was simply letting you know the issue. I wasn't hypocritically judging you.

[_Drifting]

"Barring unforeseen complications..."

Hmmm...

I suspect the following may class as unforeseen complications;
Nobody will publish them because they are drivel.
Nobody will publish them because Will wrote them.
Nobody will publish them because they don't actually exist.
Nobody will publish them because someone was mean to Will sometime.
Nobody will publish them because...ad infinitum.......

[_Kishkumen]

"Barring unforeseen complications..."

Hmmm...

I suspect the following may class as unforeseen complications;
Nobody will publish them because they are drivel.
Nobody will publish them because Will wrote them.
Nobody will publish them because they don't actually exist.
Nobody will publish them because someone was mean to Will sometime.
Nobody will publish them because...ad infinitum.......

Just like old Donald Trump.

[_Buffalo]

But that would just be petty.

Good decision. You should know that Wade has a learning disability.

That kind of explains why he's the only fan Schryver has who isn't a Schryver sock puppet (or a dry drunk with a crush on Will).

Just sayin. :o

[_Buffalo]

[_Kishkumen]

That kind of explains why he's the only fan Schryver has who isn't a Schryver sock puppet (or a dry drunk with a crush on Will).

Just sayin. :o

Birds of a feather flock together.

[_Carton]

Funny how his articles are addressed squarely to the people whom he perceives to be his enemies. No one could have foreseen that twist.

How can Hauglid be his enemy? Surely they play for the same team.

Hauglid was the guy "on the inside" who got him shot down by the Maxwell Institute.

http://www.mormondiscussions.com/phpBB3 ... 1&p=457542

I'm sure the next thing we'll hear from Schryver is that Hauglid is on the brink of apostasy.

[_Carton]

In the way of news: I have, in the past few days, completed the initial drafts of two articles that address major shortcomings in the Hauglid analysis (sparse as it was) of the Abraham manuscripts. I have commenced a much longer third article that will simultaneously address another important shortcoming in the Hauglid analysis of the Abraham manuscripts, and also constitute a comprehensive critique of the 2010 JWHA Christopher Smith paper: The Dependence of Abraham 1:1-3 on the Egyptian Alphabet and Grammar.

Barring any unforeseen complications, all three articles will be published during the first half of 2012

How long is this going to be spun out?

Who's going to publish these game-changing articles? Has he said?

[_Kishkumen]

I'm sure the next thing we'll hear from Schryver is that Hauglid is on the brink of apostasy.

On the brink? I would say that, according to Schryver-think, Hauglid is a wolf in sheep's clothing.