Runtu wrote:We ought to have categories:
Best thread.
Best post.
Worst thread
Worst post.
Least decipherable post.
Most pointless thread.
Funniest thread.
Funniest post.
Best scholarly thread.
Best scholarly post.
And so on.
Yes, we should.
Runtu wrote:We ought to have categories:
Best thread.
Best post.
Worst thread
Worst post.
Least decipherable post.
Most pointless thread.
Funniest thread.
Funniest post.
Best scholarly thread.
Best scholarly post.
And so on.
sock puppet wrote:I don't even think we need to vote--
It's MsJack by acclamation!
Darth J wrote:Yes, we should.
Darth J wrote:Best post.
ldsfaqs wrote:Joseph WAS trustworthy..... You're all's perversion of history and facts of the events in question is not the same as him being a proven liar. We've taken those same events and show the WHOLE TRUTH that he wasn't a liar at all.
For example, when he said he and the Church wasn't practicing Polygamy when accused of it, he was being entirely honest. The Church nor him was practicing "Polygamy". They were practicing the Sealing Ordinance at the time, not even Polygamy. It was a Sealing ONLY, not the same as Plural and especially Polygamous Marriage. It's the entire reason he was able to be sealed to other mens wives, because it WAS ONLY Sealing, not actually Polygamous Marriage.
So who's the liars again? Anti-mormons like you all.