Now I must hit the rack. Brethren, I bid you adieu.

Sethbag wrote:Thanks Stak, that really set the tone. I just had a little drink and a private toast to Christopher, not for his sake, because he no longer has one, but because he meant something to me, and I do. ;-)
RayAgostini wrote:Sethbag wrote:Thanks Stak, that really set the tone. I just had a little drink and a private toast to Christopher, not for his sake, because he no longer has one, but because he meant something to me, and I do. ;-)
In future, I hope you'll be somewhat more diplomatic and ease off calling Joseph Smith a fraud and an adulterer. Your hero doesn't appear to be sinless. He no longer exists, anyway, and is now just worm-fodder. Just like you will be. Like a month-living moth on a wall of despair. Born today, dead tomorrow, and that's it. Why even bother. It's all pointless, with some interim clapping and adulation, which means zilch. Your children are just flesh and meat, bodies destined to die and rot in graves forever. Praise Hitch, for such an ennobling vision. A true saviour from "religious ignorance", and all, of course, based on "evidence" very convenient to his innate narcissism.
Chap wrote:Isn't it sad to see religious believers who (if we are to take their more intemperately abusive posts seriously) would not feel able to bother with their lives or care about their children unless they could believe there was a sky daddy to love them?
brade wrote:Chap wrote:Isn't it sad to see religious believers who (if we are to take their more intemperately abusive posts seriously) would not feel able to bother with their lives or care about their children unless they could believe there was a sky daddy to love them?
Religion, on the whole, makes the world a better place by preventing millions of people who would otherwise be violent marauders from perpetrating their wickedness upon their fellow men. If fast and testimony meeting is anything to go by, then when I go to church on Sunday I'm sitting amongst people who would, were it not for religion filling in, be out raping and murdering in a cocaine induced frenzy.
RayAgostini wrote:Sethbag wrote:Ray, I'm sorry you're all worked up about this. You're perfectly welcome to think whatever you like about Christopher Hitchens. For my part, his death diminishes the world a little bit.
Of course. If you share his "death is the end" philosophy, then I understand why you'd sing praises to him. No doubt his brain is now being eaten by earth worms, and his life was totally meaningless. Nothing at all.
Zip, zap, and he's gone. Might as well have said nothing. What was the bloody point of existing in the first place? To convince people that death is the end?
While I don't generally decry passive atheism, or agnosticism, pastors and preachers of atheism, like Hitchens, Dawkins and Harris, are just full of themselves as "guiding lights" to nowhere. A dead end. And they completely ignore all of the evidence contrary to their sacred and not to be challenged opinions, but they totally and comprehensively refuse to even consider it. And their dogma is swallowed by millions, who don't have the nerve to question them.