why me wrote: Why? It really doesn't matter for a married couple. They can wear what they like when they are at home---sexy underwear and all. And for singles, well, it is up to them. Here is the point: if one wishes to make out, one can take the garments off and not wear them. Free choice, free agency. They are not glued onto the body.
You really don't know what the Church teaches at all...
And in a letter to priesthood leaders dated 10 October 1988, the First Presidency made the following important statements regarding how the garment should be worn: “Church members who have been clothed with the garment in the temple have made a covenant to wear it throughout their lives. This has been interpreted to mean that it is worn as underclothing both day and night. This sacred covenant is between the member and the Lord. Members should seek the guidance of the Holy Spirit to answer for themselves any personal questions about the wearing of the garment. … The promise of protection and blessings is conditioned upon worthiness and faithfulness in keeping the covenant.
“The fundamental principle ought to be to wear the garment and not to find occasions to remove it. Thus, members should not remove either all or part of the garment to work in the yard or to lounge around the home in swimwear or immodest clothing. Nor should they remove it to participate in recreational activities that can reasonably be done with the garment worn properly beneath regular clothing. When the garment must be removed, such as for swimming, it should be restored as soon as possible.
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
Interesting how LDS Members try to figure out ways to keep the zest in their relationship *despite* having to wear garments. They find moments (or an hour here and there) to wear other things in an effort to spice it up. Why can't divine clothing do the "work of God"? Why can't angelic clothing stand on its own? Shouldn't the garment surpass all other undergarments in spicing up a celestial marriage?
Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm here to tell you I'm going to revolutionize the system! Just like Mr. William Schryver, I'm telling you something amazing is going to take place. You, my MDB friends, will be the first to partake of my work. No more will the WhyMe's of the world have to make excuses for the garment of the holy priesthood! No more!
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)
These women probably don't wear garments. They are nonmormon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95% of Mormon women I know are more or less thicker.
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco - To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
Drifting wrote:. Nor should they remove it to participate in recreational activities that can reasonably be done with the garment worn properly beneath regular clothing. When the garment must be removed, such as for swimming, it should be restored as soon as possible.
Here was my point: a husband and wife get the itch. Hubby wants some action and wife does too. Hubby wants the wife to wear those hot red victoria secret underwear before the activity begins. Wife obliges. Both are horny toads because of the underwear. End of story. Both take a shower after a good rest and put on garments.
How is that byline?
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
zeezrom wrote:Interesting how LDS Members try to figure out ways to keep the zest in their relationship *despite* having to wear garments. They find moments (or an hour here and there) to wear other things in an effort to spice it up. Why can't divine clothing do the "work of God"? Why can't angelic clothing stand on its own? Shouldn't the garment surpass all other undergarments in spicing up a celestial marriage?
Excuse me Zee, but I have something to whisper in your ear. Can you please come close to the computer because I don't want anyone else to hear. That's right, come just a little closer.........are you ready....do you think that women are constantly wearing sexy underwear under their clothes just in case some guy of theirs want sex? Here is how it works:
Husband and wife are planning on having sex. It is all planned by phone from the office. After a hard day at work both are ready for some hot action. Wife puts on her really sexy underwear. The kind that would make any husband's mouth water. And the guy wears the wife's favorite pair of fruit of the looms...the ones with a superman symbol over the crotch. And after some hot foreplay, the action really begins. Afterwards, after some rest together...they put back on their garments with a nice smile on their faces and love in their eyes.
Whether one is wearing garments or is just wearing regular underwear, this scene is played out over and over in american homes. It has nothing to do with garments.
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Drifting wrote:. Nor should they remove it to participate in recreational activities that can reasonably be done with the garment worn properly beneath regular clothing. When the garment must be removed, such as for swimming, it should be restored as soon as possible.
Here was my point: a husband and wife get the itch. Hubby wants some action and wife does too. Hubby wants the wife to wear those hot red victoria secret underwear before the activity begins. Wife obliges. Both are horny toads because of the underwear. End of story. Both take a shower after a good rest and put on garments.
How is that byline?
Hmmm...
As a little test, ask your Bishop or Stake President if your view that 'sexy underwear is okay' is consistent with Church teachings. I dare you, I double dare you...
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
zeezrom wrote:Interesting how LDS Members try to figure out ways to keep the zest in their relationship *despite* having to wear garments. They find moments (or an hour here and there) to wear other things in an effort to spice it up. Why can't divine clothing do the "work of God"? Why can't angelic clothing stand on its own? Shouldn't the garment surpass all other undergarments in spicing up a celestial marriage?
Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm here to tell you I'm going to revolutionize the system! Just like Mr. William Schryver, I'm telling you something amazing is going to take place. You, my MDB friends, will be the first to partake of my work. No more will the WhyMe's of the world have to make excuses for the garment of the holy priesthood! No more!
May Athena's grace go with you in your mission of mercy!
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
zeezrom wrote:Interesting how LDS Members try to figure out ways to keep the zest in their relationship *despite* having to wear garments. They find moments (or an hour here and there) to wear other things in an effort to spice it up. Why can't divine clothing do the "work of God"? Why can't angelic clothing stand on its own? Shouldn't the garment surpass all other undergarments in spicing up a celestial marriage?
Excuse me Zee, but I have something to whisper in your ear. Can you please come close to the computer because I don't want anyone else to hear. That's right, come just a little closer.........are you ready....do you think that women are constantly wearing sexy underwear under their clothes just in case some guy of theirs want sex? Here is how it works:
Husband and wife are planning on having sex. It is all planned by phone from the office. After a hard day at work both are ready for some hot action. Wife puts on her really sexy underwear. The kind that would make any husband's mouth water. And the guy wears the wife's favorite pair of fruit of the looms...the ones with a superman symbol over the crotch. And after some hot foreplay, the action really begins. Afterwards, after some rest together...they put back on their garments with a nice smile on their faces and love in their eyes.
Whether one is wearing garments or is just wearing regular underwear, this scene is played out over and over in american homes. It has nothing to do with garments.
Why Me, even granny panties look sexy compared to garments.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.
why me wrote:Excuse me Zee, but I have something to whisper in your ear. Can you please come close to the computer because I don't want anyone else to hear. That's right, come just a little closer.........are you ready....do you think that women are constantly wearing sexy underwear under their clothes just in case some guy of theirs want sex? Here is how it works:
Well when you compare the sexyness ofthis to that of garments, then yes women are constantly wearing sexy underwear under their clothes.
to that of garments, then yes women are constantly wearing sexy underwear under their clothes.