Shouldn't Joseph's revelations take precendence?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Shouldn't Joseph's revelations take precendence?

Post by _Buffalo »

After all, he was the only Mormon prophet to really claim direct, regular communication with Eloheim. Hinckley admitted that his revelations followed the same form that all other modern Mormons get - subtle impressions, the still small voice, feelings, etc. Joseph talked with God face to face, and also received direct, first person revelation from God (eg, "I the Lord am displeased with...").

So, for instance, why shouldn't Joseph's inspired take on the Word of Wisdom (beer and wine are okay, hot drinks of any kind are not, but none of this is compulsory) take precedence over Heber J. Grant's radical reinterpretation of the original revelation? After all, it was Joseph who had the direct line to God, not his predecessors, by their own admission.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_DarkHelmet
_Emeritus
Posts: 5422
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:38 pm

Re: Shouldn't Joseph's revelations take precendence?

Post by _DarkHelmet »

Buffalo wrote:After all, he was the only Mormon prophet to really claim direct, regular communication with Eloheim. Hinckley admitted that his revelations followed the same form that all other modern Mormons get - subtle impressions, the still small voice, feelings, etc. Joseph talked with God face to face, and also received direct, first person revelation from God (eg, "I the Lord am displeased with...").

So, for instance, why shouldn't Joseph's inspired take on the Word of Wisdom (beer and wine are okay, hot drinks of any kind are not, but none of this is compulsory) take precedence over Heber J. Grant's radical reinterpretation of the original revelation? After all, it was Joseph who had the direct line to God, not his predecessors, by their own admission.


good point. But his revelations tend to be accepted as scripture (almost the entire D&C), except for the embarrassing ones that didn't get canonized. Those become just opinion, and later prophets and apologists clarify what Joseph really meant. But you make a good point. If Joseph said there are men on the moon and had a full description of what they looked like and dressed like, coming from a guy who talks to god, that should be doctrinal.
"We have taken up arms in defense of our liberty, our property, our wives, and our children; we are determined to preserve them, or die."
- Captain Moroni - 'Address to the Inhabitants of Canada' 1775
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: Shouldn't Joseph's revelations take precendence?

Post by _zeezrom »

Dark H. Vader guy: you need to reset your avatar- I can't see it.

Hey Buff,

Obviously, for a religion, the answer would be yes. What does the church want to emphasize these days? I'm getting this message from their ad campaign: "We are normal like you!"

Maybe later they will get back to a religion.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_Sethbag
_Emeritus
Posts: 6855
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 10:52 am

Re: Shouldn't Joseph's revelations take precendence?

Post by _Sethbag »

Joseph Smith only talked face to face with God because God hadn't yet set up the Celestial Order of the Committee. Now that there are 15 men who can discuss things around a table in the upper room of the temple and vote on them, and not make any major decisions except with unanimity, God simply doesn't need to appear to the Prophet, Seer, and Revelator anymore.
Mormonism ceased being a compelling topic for me when I finally came to terms with its transformation from a personality cult into a combination of a real estate company, a SuperPac, and Westboro Baptist Church. - Kishkumen
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Shouldn't Joseph's revelations take precendence?

Post by _Buffalo »

Sethbag wrote:Joseph Smith only talked face to face with God because God hadn't yet set up the Celestial Order of the Committee. Now that there are 15 men who can discuss things around a table in the upper room of the temple and vote on them, and not make any major decisions except with unanimity, God simply doesn't need to appear to the Prophet, Seer, and Revelator anymore.


Obviously God guided the development of the concept of a board of directors so that his church could move onto perfection!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_directors#History
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
Post Reply