MDD Forum - credit where it's due

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _Buffalo »

Molok wrote:
Lizard Jew wrote:bzzzzzt.

try again.

two quarters.

do not pass go.

Next time you say this, don't do it on a board populated with critics that have been banned from MDD.


Indeed!
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_MsJack
_Emeritus
Posts: 4375
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:06 am

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _MsJack »

Until they unban the folks who were banned while not even posting there (like myself and Darth J) as well as the folks who were capriciously banned for no reason (like Ceeboo, Consiglieri and RockSlider), they're not getting any credit from me.
"It seems to me that these women were the head (κεφάλαιον) of the church which was at Philippi." ~ John Chrysostom, Homilies on Philippians 13

My Blogs: Weighted Glory | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable | Twitter
_Lizard Jew
_Emeritus
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:59 pm

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _Lizard Jew »

Molok wrote:
Lizard Jew wrote:bzzzzzt.

try again.

two quarters.

do not pass go.

Next time you say this, don't do it on a board populated with critics that have been banned from MDD.

i suppose you think you were all banned because of you're cracker jack argument?
john 3:16 is overused.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _harmony »

MsJack wrote:Until they unban the folks who were banned while not even posting there (like myself and Darth J) as well as the folks who were capriciously banned for no reason (like Ceeboo, Consiglieri and RockSlider), they're not getting any credit from me.


And Dill Pickles! And Jersey Girl. And Liz.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _Molok »

Lizard Jew wrote:[Next time you say this, don't do it on a board populated with critics that have been banned from MDD.
i suppose you think you were all banned because of you're cracker jack argument?

Not at all, Mister Lizard Jew. There are probably as many specific reasons for why posters get banned as there are posters, but the key point is, if they weren't critics, MDD would not have banned them.
_keithb
_Emeritus
Posts: 607
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:09 am

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _keithb »

MsJack wrote:Until they unban the folks who were banned while not even posting there (like myself and Darth J) as well as the folks who were capriciously banned for no reason (like Ceeboo, Consiglieri and RockSlider), they're not getting any credit from me.



I had four different accounts banned over there.
"Joseph Smith was called as a prophet, dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb-dumb" -South Park
_MrStakhanovite
_Emeritus
Posts: 5269
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 3:32 am

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _MrStakhanovite »

I can't tell if Lizard Jew is a fan of David Icke, some gamer oblivious to the anti-Semitic term he's picked up, or a sock EA looking to troll.

Per the usual, I’ll go ahead and support the notion that this is really EA trolling.
_Lizard Jew
_Emeritus
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:59 pm

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _Lizard Jew »

Molok wrote:
Lizard Jew wrote:[Next time you say this, don't do it on a board populated with critics that have been banned from MDD.
i suppose you think you were all banned because of you're cracker jack argument?

Not at all, Mister Lizard Jew. There are probably as many specific reasons for why posters get banned as there are posters, but the key point is, if they weren't critics, MDD would not have banned them.

so critics were banned for other reasons than the supposed need to silence un answered criticism?
john 3:16 is overused.
_Lizard Jew
_Emeritus
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 5:59 pm

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _Lizard Jew »

MrStakhanovite wrote:I can't tell if Lizard Jew is a fan of David Icke, some gamer oblivious to the anti-Semitic term he's picked up, or a sock EA looking to troll.

Per the usual, I’ll go ahead and support the notion that this is really EA trolling.

i can see why you might think its meant to be anti-semitic, but really its an old personal inside joke from another forum i posted on.

it was a conspiracy 911 truther board and the true masters were always reptillian lizard aliens or jews. lizard jew was my name based on this.

but if i say something that comes acrossed as trolling, i'm sorry.

i am never good at monitoring my tone.
john 3:16 is overused.
_Molok
_Emeritus
Posts: 1832
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:31 am

Re: MDD Forum - credit where it's due

Post by _Molok »

Lizard Jew wrote:so critics were banned for other reasons than the supposed need to silence un answered criticism?

Why are you focusing on specific reasons for bans? If you're truly curious, I would recommend starting a thread and asking people to post why they were banned from MDD. It would probably make for some hilarious reading.
Post Reply