Kevin Graham wrote: Produce an example already or admit you are lying. I have said nothing that compares to wade's comments calling me delusiinal- beyond rational input, etc etc. You don't know what u r talking about as usual and have now resorted to lying.
How can I produce an example when they have been deleted by the mods with a red warning?
I intend to lay a foundation that will revolutionize the whole world. Joseph Smith We are “to feed the hungry, to clothe the naked, to provide for the widow, to dry up the tear of the orphan, to comfort the afflicted, whether in this church, or in any other, or in no church at all…” Joseph Smith
Is it at all possible that this is another covert cull of an embarrassingly crap apologist - perhaps forwarding a certain GA's agenda on the war on crapologists...?
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.” Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric
"One, two, three...let's go shopping!" Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
MsJack wrote:That doesn't mean posters at this forum were contacting MI scholars and asking them to consider the thread though. I got plenty of e-mails concerning the thread from people who weren't registered here and had never posted here before, people whom I very much doubt were directly contacted concerning the thread. Word has a funny way of getting around.
Not only that, my recollection is that Will actually invited posters at MDDB to come over here and see for themselves that he is not a misogynist and has never said anything that could remotely be construed as derogatory to women.
I personally know of at least one MDDB poster who took him up on his invitation and was not impressed with Will's conduct here.
The phrase "hoisted with his own petard" comes to mind.
What Ms. Jack did to Will is what Hamlet did to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern:
And ’t shall go hard, But I will delve one yard below their mines, And blow them at the moon. Oh, ’tis most sweet When in one line two crafts directly meet.
All the Best!
--Consiglieri
You prove yourself of the devil and anti-mormon every word you utter, because only the devil perverts facts to make their case.--ldsfaqs (6-24-13)
consiglieri wrote: What Ms. Jack did to Will is what Hamlet did to Rosencrantz and Guildenstern:
And ’t shall go hard, But I will delve one yard below their mines, And blow them at the moon. Oh, ’tis most sweet When in one line two crafts directly meet.
All the Best!
--Consiglieri
I'm writing a play called Will Schryver and Loran Blood are Banned.
MsJack wrote:Which posters did this? It certainly wasn't me.
How was his publication squashed?
While others have answered your question, I have to wonder why you would ask a question everyone already knew. People at MI are not on some island. Many of them read and participate in these forums and are very well aware of Will and his antics. I suspect though that his bad behavior is an excuse MI is using to not publish what they now know would be more embarrassing then their usual stuff, and that is saying something. :)
Will has picked fights in the past with the likes of LifeOnaPlate (who, as Ray has apparently shown, is a moderator) and, If I recall correctly, David Bokovoy. The notion that Will's account would be *totally* banned simply over his sigline is, frankly, unbelievable. My guess at this point is that Will was threatening to do something that utterly terrified the MDB moderating team. Perhaps he intended to target someone who ranks higher than Bokovoy and LoaP?
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14