A Counter-Plea for 2012

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: A Counter-Plea for 2012

Post by _Dr. Shades »

honorentheos wrote:Also, 2011 has left me even more impressed with Dr. Shades who seems supernaturally immune to peer-pressure and opinion in his aim to provide a truly free-speech environment.

Wow, THANK YOU for the kind words! And a happy new year to you.

May 2012 be the year of Tarski, Shades, Kish, Blixa, and Gad.

To be grouped in the same sentence with those luminaries is a grand compliment indeed. I appreciate it.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: A Counter-Plea for 2012

Post by _moksha »

Here is to also hoping for the year of Asbestosman, Some Schmo, Consiglieri, Ray and Pokatator. Happy New Year.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_sock puppet
_Emeritus
Posts: 17063
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: A Counter-Plea for 2012

Post by _sock puppet »

Blixa wrote:..."mopologetics:" a term which designates to me a body of apologia that is disingenuous, intellectually vapid and invested in histrionic ad hominem attack...
When you consider what they are defending--not just the social, historical and cultural aspects of Mormonism, but its truth claims--those three might be the best tools available for mopologists. Defending the indefensible requires diversionary tactics.
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Re: A Counter-Plea for 2012

Post by _Blixa »

sock puppet wrote:
Blixa wrote:..."mopologetics:" a term which designates to me a body of apologia that is disingenuous, intellectually vapid and invested in histrionic ad hominem attack...
When you consider what they are defending--not just the social, historical and cultural aspects of Mormonism, but its truth claims--those three might be the best tools available for mopologists. Defending the indefensible requires diversionary tactics.


Well, I don't know about that. For example, LDST provided a cogent defense of the Book of Abraham in Celestial (basic catalyst theory) that didn't descend to personal smears or ascend to hysteric victimist arias. And while I don't "buy" that argument, it does have a perfectly consistent internal logic.

And we could find scholars like Bushman who are more forthcoming in their own writing and apparently open to encouraging the historical work of secular scholars. I think it is possible to provide useful discussions of theology, of history, of doubts, of various "truth claims" without the intellectually belligerent dirty fighting that I associate with those who are labeled "mopologists."
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: A Counter-Plea for 2012

Post by _zeezrom »

I'm one of those MDB members that is in debt. I take from here much, much more than I give. I don't think anyone knows the extent of positive therapy this place has provided me. I could easily list a solid 40 people here that have helped me out in some way. Obviously, those listed in the OP are included in that list.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
Post Reply