For BrianH--Response to Challenge No. 7--Passwords to Heaven

[_Runtu]

I can't decide whether to taunt or whimper.

Don't break from your convention... do BOTH!

-BH

.

I would mock you for that if I weren't so personally hurt.

[_consiglieri]

Knowing a pack of liars when I see them does not constitute bigotry. It is the result of experience with Mormons.

It is good you can know liars just be seeing them.

[_BrianH]

BH>> If all you want is a pointless pissing match, boy ...go somewhere else[/b]. I am busy frying the claims of Mormonism and don't have time to engage in your alternating taunting and whimpering.

This is the second time you've broken board rules by asking people to go elsewhere. And second, if Runtu is black, he's gonna be mighty pissed at your racial slur, masta.

H.[/quote]

LOL ...how incredibly wimpy and anemic. I would have been embarrassed to make such a desperate reach as this. And right out in public too.

Wow

Tell ya what... I am calling your bluff, H-man: I challence you to call a mod and have them rule on your accusation.

I DARE ya...

-BH

.

[_BrianH]

Knowing a pack of liars when I see them does not constitute bigotry. It is the result of experience with Mormons.

It is good you can know liars just be seeing them.

...seeing them LIE, yeah. Its easy.

Let me know if you ever want to get off the stupid word play and debate the claims of Mormonism. Until you do, I have no use for your childish taunting.

-BH

.

[_Runtu]

LOL ...how incredibly wimpy and anemic. I would have been embarrassed to make such a desperate reach as this. And right out in public too.

Wow

Tell ya what... I am calling your bluff, H-man: I challence you to call a mod and have them rule on your accusation.

I DARE ya...

-BH

.

I must be getting old, but you made me think of this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr-oLQgvcuk

[_consiglieri]

Apparently challenging the claims of Mormonism on a board entitled "Mormon Discussions" constitutes an insult to those here, who appear to be mostly disgruntled, bitter, whining ex-Mormons.

Okay, now I'm really confused, Brian.

I thought disgruntled, bitter, whining ex-Mormons are what you seek to create.

[Guest]

Knowing a pack of liars when I see them does not constitute bigotry. It is the result of experience with Mormons.

If all you want is to engage in the usual crybabying and jeering that constitutes the majority of what goes on in this forum of wimps and whiners, find someone else to pester.

If on the other hand you want to try to defend the claims of Momronism (whether YOU are a Mormon or not), then I'm you man.

What's it gonna be?

-BH

R>I have no interest in defending Mormonism. I've already told you that. But I will always defend Mormons and anyone else from unfair and bigoted attacks, like the ones you've been spewing.

So its okay for you and your boys to launch personal attacks and pretend to defend calims even YOU do not believe, right?

I'

ve known enough Mormons in my life to understand that most are honest, decent people who believe in what they say. That some apologists and Internet posters have a problem with honesty does not mean that Mormons in general are "a pack of liars."

Believing one's own lies does not make them true. The Mormons to whom I was refering are those who have lied to me for years over and over again and then engaged in exactly the same kind of whining and crybabying that the exmos on this board exhibit when the Mormon lies were exposed with even the simplest and most obvious questions, such as the one that spawned this thread

If standing against bigots makes me a wimp or a whiner, so be it. (Does anyone else notice how often folks like Brian resort to misogyny, calling people girls and wimps as an insult?)

Wimping and whining is what makes someone a wimp and a whiner, no matter what they think they are doing with all their whining.

I am not interested in a pissing match with all the whiners here. I am interested in a substantive debate with those who will honestly try to defend the claims of Mormonism.

Apparently there are no (or at least VERY few) such people here.

-BH

.

[Guest]

I think passwords and handshakes appear problematic.

I agree, as well, if we are going to interpret them literally as opposed to signs connoting the trials, wisdom and soul-passages of the bearer that qualify him or her to be so presumptuous as to ask God's name from God himself.

The most holy name which can be revealed at only one point in the temple, and which is required for entrance into God's presence.

But perhaps I have said too much . . .

All the Best!

--Consiglieri

[_lostindc]

first day back in a long time. I am guessing Brian H is not a crowd pleaser.

[Wimping and whining is what makes someone a wimp and a whiner, no matter what they think they are doing with all their whining.

I am not interested in a pissing match with all the whiners here. I am interested in a substantive debate with those who will honestly try to defend the claims of Mormonism.

Apparently there are no (or at least VERY few) such people here.

-BH

.

[_lostindc]

consig,

hope life has been treating you well. I think you display a fairly good argument but I am not sure many LDS hardliners would support this interpretation, not that it really matters.

I think passwords and handshakes appear problematic.

I agree, as well, if we are going to interpret them literally as opposed to signs connoting the trials, wisdom and soul-passages of the bearer that qualify him or her to be so presumptuous as to ask God's name from God himself.

The most holy name which can be revealed at only one point in the temple, and which is required for entrance into God's presence.

But perhaps I have said too much . . .

All the Best!

--Consiglieri