What is it with Republicans and sexual deviance?

[_Droopy]

I already posted this list. It's pretty tiny compared to the GOP list.

But its not an exhaustive list, on either side. Its a cherry picked ad hominem smear against an entire class of Americans (the left's standard and historical modus operandi in most cases in which they are challenged to defend their beliefs).

Its probably enough to simply show that the Democratic party - the post sixties, post McGovern Democratic party, is the party of the sexual revolution, the party of moral relativism and environmental determinism in human ethics, the party of no fault divorce, the party of the unfettered, radically autonomous self (when that is, its not being the party of collectivist absorption of the individual into the group) the party of feminist self fulfillment in the corporate world (the only aspect of the corporate world they find acceptable - when it tends to the dissolving of the nuclear family and traditional marriage), the party of polymorphous perversity (the the legitimation and support of all things LGBT), the party of convenience abortion on demand from the moment of concept to the moment of birth without parental consent for minors, the party of explicit sex education beginning in early grades, and the party, in sum, of Kinsey.

The Republican party, whatever the faults of some of its individual members, has stayed for the most part, as a party, aloof from an ideological marriage with the cultural Left, into which the Democratic party plunged after the late sixties.

[_Buffalo]

I already posted this list. It's pretty tiny compared to the GOP list.

Just because someone has a "life" to not post as BIG of a list that I'm sure could have been posted, doesn't mean Republicans actually have "more" bad.

Further, your "long" list is clearly suspect given the last statement which is clearly false.
Thus, how many of the other claims of "evil" is actually false in that list? Likely many knowing liberals.

What interest do you have in protecting child molesters from criticism?

[_Buffalo]

I already posted this list. It's pretty tiny compared to the GOP list.

But its not an exhaustive list, on either side. Its a cherry picked ad hominem smear against an entire class of Americans (the left's standard and historical modus operandi in most cases in which they are challenged to defend their beliefs).

Its probably enough to simply show that the Democratic party - the post sixties, post McGovern Democratic party, is the party of the sexual revolution, the party of moral relativism and environmental determinism in human ethics, the party of no fault divorce, the party of the unfettered, radically autonomous self (when that is, its not being the party of collectivist absorption of the individual into the group) the party of feminist self fulfillment in the corporate world (the only aspect of the corporate world they find acceptable - when it tends to the dissolving of the nuclear family and traditional marriage), the party of polymorphous perversity (the the legitimation and support of all things LGBT), the party of convenience abortion on demand from the moment of concept to the moment of birth without parental consent for minors, the party of explicit sex education beginning in early grades, and the party, in sum, of Kinsey.

The Republican party, whatever the faults of some of its individual members, has stayed for the most part, as a party, aloof from an ideological marriage with the cultural Left, into which the Democratic party plunged after the late sixties.

Of course they're cherry picked - they picked only the pedophiles from the group. Guess which side had more. :)

[_Droopy]

Of course they're cherry picked - they picked only the pedophiles from the group. Guess which side had more.

I don't know, and you don't know, but based upon the ideology of the Democrat party over several generations, Its not hard to infer where the polymorphous perversity really lies.

But then, you wouldn't know anything about that, being a pure, innocent, righteous liberal and all...

[_Tarski]

I don't know, and you don't know, but based upon the ideology of the Democrat party over several generations, Its not hard to infer where the polymorphous perversity really lies.

You can't separate child rape from the adult consensual sexual activity of some (lucky) social liberals?

Explain to me why (protected) kinky wild sex between single adults is so wrong without special pleading, begging the question, or refering to something supernatural or imaginary.

[_EAllusion]

On the plus side, at least Grover Norquist has a pretty good sense of humor about the habit of "family values" types getting caught in twisted sexual scandals.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/scanda ... d-o,27020/

I lol'ed.

[_Droopy]

You can't separate child rape from the adult consensual sexual activity of some (lucky) social liberals?

Huh?

Explain to me why (protected) kinky wild sex between single adults is so wrong without special pleading, begging the question, or refering to something supernatural or imaginary.

Would you care to tackle this in the Celestial?

[_Buffalo]

http://www.republicansforrape.org/