bcspace wrote:Did a search on LDS.org. Lots of articles with those two words, nothing with those two words combined like that that I could see. Do you have an actual reference or a link?
From Dallin H. Oaks’ talk on pornography during the April 2005 General Conference:
"And young women, please understand that if you dress immodestly, you are magnifying this problem by becoming pornography to some of the men who see you."
Did a search on LDS.org. Lots of articles with those two words, nothing with those two words combined like that that I could see. Do you have an actual reference or a link?
From Dallin H. Oaks’ talk on pornography during the April 2005 General Conference:
"And young women, please understand that if you dress immodestly, you are magnifying this problem by becoming pornography to some of the men who see you."
Okay thanks. Now back to the question: How does this imply, as sethpayne says it does, that a man cannot be aroused by a modestly dressed woman?
bcspace wrote:Here's a question for you (giving this thread actual purpose). Would it be a sin, according to the LDS Church and in and of itself, for a man to see a woman and become aroused?
It seems to be according to the Bible.
Matthew 5:28 wrote:But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart
... if you dress immodestly, you are magnifying this problem ...
... for a man to see a woman and become aroused ...
"Is that a gun in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?"
- Whenever a poet or preacher, chief or wizard spouts gibberish, the human race spends centuries deciphering the message. - Umberto Eco - To assert that the earth revolves around the sun is as erroneous as to claim that Jesus was not born of a virgin. - Cardinal Bellarmine at the trial of Galilei
