It's Official - Stand and Shout the Gays are Out (link)

[_schreech]

a moronic conclusion.

Ah, yet another wannabe-delusional-apologist that always seems to be misunderstood.

So paul says:

"I just want to be who I really am and enjoy my happiness under the sun."

To which you replied:

"what a great moral compass...if only Charles Manson had been allowed to be who he truly was....oppressive government and uncaring society squelched his freedom."

Yea, its crazy to think that you were comparing paul/homosexuals to Charles Manson...

What exactly bothers you about homosexuals? How exactly are homosexuals affecting your life? Its kind of pathetic that you can't come up with anything beyond tired religious excuses for your bigotry.

[_Buffalo]

What exactly bothers you about homosexuals? How exactly are homosexuals affecting your life? Its kind of pathetic that you can't come up with anything beyond tired religious excuses for your bigotry.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1d63ClccjjE

[_Droopy]

Do most Mormon ladies pierce their bodies?
I think you'll find most do - their ears which, if I remember my biology correctly, do form part of the body.

You know of what I speak. No need to be coy and play dumb.

Do most Mormon ladies paint their body?
I think you'll find most do - their faces and nails which, if I remember my biology correctly, do form part of the body.

No need to be coy and play dumb.

And as for tattooing...

Still, tattooed Mormons have managed to find one another and form a kind of subculture. “I was blown away by the amount of tattoos I viewed in the showers,” said James Peterson, 32, about his missionary training in Provo, Utah, in the late 1990s. When he went off on his mission to Spain, he and other missionaries would trade issues of tattoo magazines, taking care to cut out images of topless women or devils.

Anecdote like this doesn't impress me, especially given the source and the point its trying to make (looking for "hip" Mormons among the oh so mean un-hip kind).

Thanks for making my point, Drifting.

[_Buffalo]

[_subgenius]

a moronic conclusion.

Ah, yet another wannabe-delusional-apologist that always seems to be misunderstood.

So paul says:

"I just want to be who I really am and enjoy my happiness under the sun."

To which you replied:

"what a great moral compass...if only Charles Manson had been allowed to be who he truly was....oppressive government and uncaring society squelched his freedom."

Yea, its crazy to think that you were comparing paul/homosexuals to Charles Manson...

not crazy....moronic.
My criticism is that everyone can claim "i just want to be who i really am", and that claim is hardly justification.

What exactly bothers you about homosexuals? How exactly are homosexuals affecting your life? Its kind of pathetic that you can't come up with anything beyond tired religious excuses for your bigotry.

I have never said i have a problem with LGBT, except on one issue - marriage. Why? because marriage is subsidized by society and thus is no longer a "private" enterprise. I should not be expected to support, via public funds, a situation that i am opposed to. Granted there are many of these "situations" for all of us, and alas, some are satisfied and some are not.
However, I have made my argument, not based on theology or morality, but rather from science and virtue.
I have laid out my claims and received no rebuttal, hardly even a refutation.
Consider my claim that LGBT is a genetic abnormality and a least favorable condition for evolution and survival of our species.
Consider my claim that LGBT is a psychological development retardation.
Consider my claim that LGBT offers no social virtue as has been reinforced by judicial precedent.
All these arguments have been proposed and yet all anyone wants to fixate on is that which they can truly only criticize....my mention of deviant characters and activities. For which i only mention to illustrate the careless logic people put forth as a "reason" why "i just want to be who i really am".
To be honest my alleged 'bigotry' does not bring harm to you at all, i just 'offend' you, but you seem to be hell-bent on not letting me be that way....
... ironically, i have no problem with you being a hypocrite.

[_subgenius]

(-----> insert retarded internet image here and hope it manifests truth<-----)

That image is an insult to those who actually suffered and fought for civil rights. To equate LGBT with that movement is, as the image shows, a joke.
Like i said before, increased political power still don't make the LGBT immutable.

so sorry...you lose

[_Buffalo]

(-----> insert r******* internet image here and hope it manifests truth<-----)

That image is an insult to those who actually suffered and fought for civil rights. To equate LGBT with that movement is, as the image shows, a joke.
Like i said before, increased political power still don't make the LGBT immutable.

so sorry...you lose

Yes, I get it. You hate gays. If this was 1962 you'd be lynching black people.

[_subgenius]

...
That's been your only argument, simpleton. Like Charlie Sheen, you're the only one who thinks you're "winning." :)

yea, me and about 44 other states, the UN, and the Federal Government (ie. doma)



as usual
you = "losing"

[_subgenius]

Yes, I get it. You hate gays. If this was 1962 you'd be lynching black people.

bow out gracefully Buffalot, now you just seem bitter.

[_Buffalo]

Yes, I get it. You hate gays. If this was 1962 you'd be lynching black people.

bow out gracefully Buffalot, now you just seem bitter.

You compare gay people to murderers and rapists. It's the same sort of rhetoric southern racists used against the blacks.

Why don't you run off now and get back laundering your white hood?