bcspace wrote:Then why continue to avoid my and Brade's question regarding it. Man up.
I've not avoided the question. I merely answered it in a way that gives you no traction which is why you're upset.
bcspace, you've haven't addressed the issues I've raised at all.
More rational people seem to understand so I'm not worried about it.
Oh, will you quote for me anyone else on this forum (or anywhere else, for that matter) who has accepted your reasoning and agrees that it cogently leads to the conclusion that the Church's view is that everything in official Church publications is official Church doctrine?
Let me remind everyone what bcspace's elegant reasoning leads to. According to bcspace, the Church's view is that everything in its publications is doctrine unless it says of itself it isn't or something else says it isn't. Also, recall that from an official Church publication we learn that doctrine is the word of God. Therefore,
