Doctor Scratch wrote:Yes, and good for you. But this thread isn't about your blog. It's about your thread at MDD.
So you accuse me of failing to speak out solely against bigotry on a Mormon message board, and when I point out that on my blog I did speak out solely against bigotry (and I linked to it in the MDD post) you sidestep the fact that your comment is demonstrably false and instead tell me that I'm only supposed to be talking about my Mormon message board post? That's bushleague, Scratch. I think it's clear no thinking adult is going to take your rhetoric seriously, and trying to reason with you is obviously just a waste of time.
Doctor Scratch wrote:Yes, and good for you. But this thread isn't about your blog. It's about your thread at MDD.
So you accuse me of failing to speak out solely against bigotry on a Mormon message board, and when I point out that on my blog I did speak out solely against bigotry (and I linked to it in the MDD post) you sidestep the fact that your comment is demonstrably false and instead tell me that I'm only supposed to be talking about my Mormon message board post?
No, Mak. As you'll notice from the title of my thread, my OP here was commenting on you and your pals' apparent schadenfreude, which, as my OP also indicated, was taking place at MDD, and not at your blog. I thought that was rather obvious...
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14