My First Encounters with Institutional Mormonism

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_ldsfaqs
_Emeritus
Posts: 7953
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:41 pm

Re: My First Encounters with Institutional Mormonism

Post by _ldsfaqs »

I've already presented the arguments which debunk their claims, the science, and their flaws in judgment towards Mormonism.

So keep pretending to yourself that we LDS don't ever present facts and evidence.
It's only a fantasy world you live in yourself, not reality.
"Socialism is Rape and Capitalism is consensual sex" - Ben Shapiro
_brade
_Emeritus
Posts: 875
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 2:35 am

Re: My First Encounters with Institutional Mormonism

Post by _brade »

ldsfaqs wrote:I'm well aware of the science..... You however ignore and are completely ignorant of everything I've stated, some of which is ALSO DNA science, as well as the other aspects of Mormonism itself that you misrepresent and I've debunked.

Again, I laughed when Murphy DNA came out.... Mormonism had already long debunked anti-mormon misrepresentations of Mormonism and how body typing study's do not actually debunk mormonisms claims. Likewise, DNA doesn't do anything to Mormonism.

Anti-mormons think their "fantasy" views of Mormonism and their cherry picking of the sciences is them debunking Mormonism. Sorry buddy, it's not.....

You all keep forgetting that I've been you..... An idiot anti-mormon who thinks he's "got" ONE UP on the stupid little Mormon children. FOOLS.


ldsfaqs does apologetics the same way 4 year olds play G.I. Joes - "Oh yeah! Well my guy has laser blasters and infinite shields!!! So YOU LOSE! STUPID HEAD!".
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: My First Encounters with Institutional Mormonism

Post by _Buffalo »

brade wrote:
ldsfaqs wrote:I'm well aware of the science..... You however ignore and are completely ignorant of everything I've stated, some of which is ALSO DNA science, as well as the other aspects of Mormonism itself that you misrepresent and I've debunked.

Again, I laughed when Murphy DNA came out.... Mormonism had already long debunked anti-mormon misrepresentations of Mormonism and how body typing study's do not actually debunk mormonisms claims. Likewise, DNA doesn't do anything to Mormonism.

Anti-mormons think their "fantasy" views of Mormonism and their cherry picking of the sciences is them debunking Mormonism. Sorry buddy, it's not.....

You all keep forgetting that I've been you..... An idiot anti-mormon who thinks he's "got" ONE UP on the stupid little Mormon children. FOOLS.


ldsfaqs does apologetics the same way 4 year olds play G.I. Joes - "Oh yeah! Well my guy has laser blasters and infinite shields!!! So YOU LOSE! STUPID HEAD!".


I was thinking something very similar :D
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_krose
_Emeritus
Posts: 2555
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:18 pm

Re: My First Encounters with Institutional Mormonism

Post by _krose »

ldsfaqs wrote:You all keep forgetting that I've been you..... An idiot anti-mormon...

You keep saying this. Could you please provide some of your writings from the time when you were arguing an "anti-mormon" point of view?

That would be interesting.
"The DNA of fictional populations appears to be the most susceptible to extinction." - Simon Southerton
_SteelHead
_Emeritus
Posts: 8261
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 1:40 am

Re: My First Encounters with Institutional Mormonism

Post by _SteelHead »

I think it would go something like:

The church is not true, you are just a bunch of TBM liars.

Powerful stuff.
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, than a gardener at war.

Some of us, on the other hand, actually prefer a religion that includes some type of correlation with reality.
~Bill Hamblin
Post Reply