Doctor Scratch wrote:In what ways do you mean? This is awfully vague.
I mean they would probably tell someone like Keller to relax.
Doctor Scratch wrote:It was President Hinckley, after all, who advised against girls wearing two earrings. And it was Elder Oaks, If I recall correctly, who spoke out against "walking pornography." Which Brethren and BYU admin have you dealt with along these lines, and how did the conversations go? I ask because I have a hard time envisioning any situation where you, Dan Maklelan, would be having conversations on *this* topic with the Brethren.
That's because you prefer to just make up stuff about me rather than limit yourself to what you actually and objectively know about me. I've talked with a few different BYU admin and general authorities about things like this, but I'm not going to go into detail. We've seen what happens when I share facts about my past in order to make a point, and I don't feel like having to deal with another thread where you make up some idiotic lie about what's motivating me.
So you're not willing to substantiate your claims? Okay. I kind of figured that you would blow smoke like this.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Doctor Scratch wrote:So you're not willing to substantiate your claims? Okay. I kind of figured that you would blow smoke like this.
I'd be happy to do it if it weren't for the fact that I've been down this road numerous times with you in the past, and you just refuse to listen. You tell me I'm lying, that my data doesn't agree with your assumptions, or that you know better than me what I'm thinking. I really don't feel like beating my head against that wall again.
Doctor Scratch wrote:So you're not willing to substantiate your claims? Okay. I kind of figured that you would blow smoke like this.
I'd be happy to do it if it weren't for the fact that I've been down this road numerous times with you in the past, and you just refuse to listen. You tell me I'm lying, that my data doesn't agree with your assumptions, or that you know better than me what I'm thinking. I really don't feel like beating my head against that wall again.
That's fine, Maklelan. Your refusal to substantiate your claims has been duly noted.
"[I]f, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14