G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexual Allegations

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Tobin
_Emeritus
Posts: 8417
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:01 pm

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Tobin »

Miss Taken wrote:
Chap wrote:I don't think there is any way a society can be asked to permit a special exception to monogamy for a religion that has more female members than male.
The practice of polygamy by more than a tiny minority leads to obvious social harm, as I think you concede. No sane modern society can sensibly permit it. Don't you agree?
Yes and Yes!!:)
Ah, so the Muslim society (which permits polygamy) is neither a sane nor modern society. I'm sure they'll be happy to hear that characterization.
"You lack vision, but I see a place where people get on and off the freeway. On and off, off and on all day, all night.... Tire salons, automobile dealerships and wonderful, wonderful billboards reaching as far as the eye can see. My God, it'll be beautiful." -- Judge Doom
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Chap »

Tobin wrote:Ah, so the Muslim society (which permits polygamy) is neither a sane nor modern society. I'm sure they'll be happy to hear that characterization.


Yup, to the extent that they permit polygamy their social organization is neither rational nor modern. That's what you get when you allow religion to dictate social legislation.

You have a problem with that?
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Tobin
_Emeritus
Posts: 8417
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:01 pm

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Tobin »

Chap wrote:
Tobin wrote:Ah, so the Muslim society (which permits polygamy) is neither a sane nor modern society. I'm sure they'll be happy to hear that characterization.
Yup, to the extent that they permit polygamy their social organization is neither rational nor modern. That's what you get when you allow religion to dictate social legislation. You have a problem with that?
I think Muslims might have a problem with that. I'm sure they'll be thrilled to hear your views on what is wrong with their society.
"You lack vision, but I see a place where people get on and off the freeway. On and off, off and on all day, all night.... Tire salons, automobile dealerships and wonderful, wonderful billboards reaching as far as the eye can see. My God, it'll be beautiful." -- Judge Doom
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Chap »

Chap wrote:
Tobin wrote:Ah, so the Muslim society (which permits polygamy) is neither a sane nor modern society. I'm sure they'll be happy to hear that characterization.
Yup, to the extent that they permit polygamy their social organization is neither rational nor modern. That's what you get when you allow religion to dictate social legislation. You have a problem with that?


Tobin wrote: I think Muslims might have a problem with that. I'm sure they'll be thrilled to hear your views on what is wrong with their society.


Repetitious kind of guy, aren't you?

And your point relevant to the social desirability of polygamy is what, exactly?
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Mary
_Emeritus
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Mary »

Tobin, I did put a caveat into my statement!! It's a murky area...

I've just found the pages on Dale's site that deal with the conversion of some of the Cochranites.

Seen in the context of the times, I don't think the general experimentation with family groups and sexual practices is so out of the ordinary...


http://olivercowdery.com/gathering/JCochran.htm


Mary
"It's a little like the Confederate Constitution guaranteeing the freedom to own slaves. Irony doesn't exist for bigots or fanatics." Maksutov
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Chap »

Miss Taken wrote:....I still think there might be occasions when [polygamy] would be necessary, or productive... I'd hate to make a hard and fast rule about the way all societies should conduct themselves...


OK. Think of some occasions when it might be socially beneficial for a modern society to permit the general practice of polygamy by anybody who wanted to, assuming that we continue to have roughly equal numbers of men and women in the population.

Then tell us what exactly those occasions might be. Until you can, maybe we had better stick to having a hard and fast rule against it, like most advanced countries do.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_marg
_Emeritus
Posts: 1072
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:58 am

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _marg »

Tobin wrote:Now, I do not know what occurred with Joseph Smith and his wives (and others involved at the time). I do not know what personal revelations they received. The suggetion is that Joseph Smith was engaged in wife swapping in an era in which such a thing would not have been tolerated by anyone. It is an assault on not only Joseph Smith but the women (and husbands) involved.


I don't think you've listened to the podcast this thread is referring to. Grant is not suggesting Smith was encouraging wife swapping but rather Emma acknowledged to someone (I don't remember who Grant mentioned)that she was quite aware Smith practiced adultery and polygamy. And it was Emma who said to Smith that it wasn't fair to her and that she should also essentially have a sex partner outside the marriage. And apparently she liked William Law. So they approached the Laws or perhaps William on his own, (not sure) asking if William would agree to being a partner for Emma. At that time Smith was not propositioning Jane Law. So it wasn't a matter of wife swapping, nor marriage of any sort. William refused. And apparently there are 2 D & C pronouncements on this. One with a subtle suggestion that Smith give Emma something and a later one suggesting that was only a test. And the second D & C Emma was said to have interpreted that it was a threat on her life if she didn't comply.

(I'd get into greater details on the D & C's and what Grant said, but I don't have time..perhaps Tobin you could listen to the podcast yourself)
_Mary
_Emeritus
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Mary »

Then tell us what exactly those occasions might be. Until you can, maybe we had better stick to having a hard and fast rule against it, like most advanced countries do.


Chap, so nice to be chatting to someone who is so obviously against it! :) I'm very happy NOT to be living in a polygamous society. However I do live in a society where there is a heck of a lot of different types of family units and how many people have affairs? I suspect that in society in general quite a lot. If you gave me a choice between an above board polygamous family man, and a man or woman who lied and cheated on each other, then I think I would take the polygamous family man...
"It's a little like the Confederate Constitution guaranteeing the freedom to own slaves. Irony doesn't exist for bigots or fanatics." Maksutov
_Mary
_Emeritus
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Mary »

Also a good wiki article here Tobin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Cochran
"It's a little like the Confederate Constitution guaranteeing the freedom to own slaves. Irony doesn't exist for bigots or fanatics." Maksutov
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: G.Palmer Mormon Discussions Podcast on Joseph Smith Sexu

Post by _Chap »

Miss Taken wrote:
Then tell us what exactly those occasions might be. Until you can, maybe we had better stick to having a hard and fast rule against it, like most advanced countries do.


Chap, so nice to be chatting to someone who is so obviously against it! :) I'm very happy NOT to be living in a polygamous society. However I do live in a society where there is a heck of a lot of different types of family units and how many people have affairs? I suspect that in society in general quite a lot. If you gave me a choice between an above board polygamous family man, and a man or woman who lied and cheated on each other, then I think I would take the polygamous family man...


We are talking social policy here, not whether it is possible for a single given polygamous family to be a decent place to live, or whether a monogamous couple can be hell on earth.

Clearly, given the choice about whether a society should give general legal permission for polygamy or not, you are against it, just as I am.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
Post Reply