Family dies holding hands, praying

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Chap »

Tobin wrote:If God hadn't meant for man to fall, then he wouldn't have put the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden to begin with.


Gosh, that is impeccable logic.

The general form of the proposition is "If God hadn't meant for X to happen, he would not have made available Y (which was a means essential for achieving X)".

So, for instance, if God hadn't meant for this to happen:

Image

he would not have made chainsaws available in "Tools-R-us"
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Chap wrote:That way of saying the opposite of what one means is, I believe, known as 'irony'.

Actually, it's known as "sarcasm," not irony, but that's okay.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Chap »

Dr. Shades wrote:
Chap wrote:That way of saying the opposite of what one means is, I believe, known as 'irony'.

Actually, it's known as "sarcasm," not irony, but that's okay.


I differ from you on that point, although you may have experienced different usages of these words from the ones I have met.

I think you will find too that formal definitions of these terms suggest that while sarcasm can use ironical statements, by no means all irony is sarcasm. But formal definitions only attempt to record usage, not to legislate for it, and any differences we may have probably do not merit our spending much time discussing them.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Hoops »

I think you have failed to notice that I am addressing Tobin in my comment on the Romans passage.
I noticed.

That way of saying the opposite of what one means is, I believe, known as 'irony'.

Strangely, I picked up on that to.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Hoops »

Chap wrote:I differ from you on that point, although you may have experienced different usages of these words from the ones I have met.

I think you will find too that formal definitions of these terms suggest that while sarcasm can use ironical statements, by no means all irony is sarcasm. But formal definitions only attempt to record usage, not to legislate for it, and any differences we may have probably do not merit our spending much time discussing them.

Seriously....?
_Chap
_Emeritus
Posts: 14190
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:23 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Chap »

Hoops wrote:
I think you have failed to notice that I am addressing Tobin in my comment on the Romans passage.
I noticed.

That way of saying the opposite of what one means is, I believe, known as 'irony'.

Strangely, I picked up on that to.


Sorry. I thought that your post was based on a misapprehension. Now it is clear that it was simply pointless. Thanks for the clarification.
Zadok:
I did not have a faith crisis. I discovered that the Church was having a truth crisis.
Maksutov:
That's the problem with this supernatural stuff, it doesn't really solve anything. It's a placeholder for ignorance.
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Hoops »

Chap wrote:
Sorry. I thought that your post was based on a misapprehension. Now it is clear that it was simply pointless. Thanks for the clarification.

Your thought that you find it pointless is exactly why I made the point.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _harmony »

liz3564 wrote:Death has always been the enemy. That is why medical science exists.

ETA---Frankly, that is why religion exists. Man has tried to combat the enemy of death in many ways...including befriending it.


True. However, death isn't the enemy, if the person isn't of the "the life is all we have" camp.

On the other hand, living for death (and the after life) is truly wasteful. And we all know what happens to the wasteful servant (they're fired).
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Buffalo »

Image
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Panopticon
_Emeritus
Posts: 172
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 2:25 pm

Re: Family dies holding hands, praying

Post by _Panopticon »

Drifting wrote:
consiglieri wrote:I haven't posted yet on this thread, but will do so quickly to add that I believe that God does intervene in the affairs of humankind, but only on very, very rare occasions.

I sometimes think God follows his own version of the Prime Directive.

Beam me up!

--Consiglieri

ETA--And sometimes when God does intervene, it may be over something as insignificant as sparing the life of a kitty cat. It may be God does not place human life on a higher plane when it comes to his choice of interventions.


Hi consig,

Can you point to a specific incidence when you believe God has intervened in this life (during our lifetime)?


I was going to ask the same thing. I suspect many believers point to pivotal events in history, such as George Washington at the Battle of Long Island. They would argue that God created the dense fog to allow Washington to escape. Had the fog not occurred, we would be living in a very different country that we are today.

What believers overlook is that the area where the battle was fought averages 12 foggy days in the month of August. The fog usually starts overnight and lingers into the morning hours. Accordingly, the odds of Washington experiencing the "miracle" of the fog is nearly 2/5. Pretty good odds. Hardly a miracle.

Hoops pointed to the recent story of someone's house surviving as an example of God's Providence. Considering that the average width of a tornado is 375 feet, and the average path length is 1 mile, the averaged destroyed area is .26 sq. miles. The urbanized zone of Oklahoma City, which is in the heart of Tornado Alley, is 244 sq miles, so if a tornado happened to enter Oklahoma City (very low odds given the size of Oklahoma), the odds of it affecting you are less than 1 in 1000. So the fact that your house wasn't destroyed by a tornado is hardly a miracle.

The bottom line is that people ascribe "miracles" to God that are fully explainable by chance.
http://www.Theofrak.com - because traditional religion is so frakked up
Post Reply