Photo banned on MDD: LGBT Civil Rights vs. Religious Freedom

[_moksha]

They are taking a big chance by coming into the gayborhood and I wouldn't advise it.

Paul O

No one should suffer the "death by a thousand handbags".

[_Nightlion]

How long before gay marriage gets its pomp and ceremony on. Can we expect a gay priesthood to make the officiating more, oh, gee, what is the word, authentic? Will gay missionaries begin to hit the streets grooming for, oh, gee, what would be the deity, Bacchus?
Jesustoowasawinebibber
Divine father and earthly mother, atones for sins, is resurrected....there ya go.

What's another abomination or two in this world anyways?

How about all the life cycle ceremonies then? Like gay birth blessings by the studied and most reverend gayergy, (just made that up) some sort of ritual green earth covenants akin to baptism/ bar mitsvah, you got marriage, then how about death, are you going to make grand gayistocratic (JMTUT) cathedrial so you can have awe inspiriting funerals? Once fellas figure that they can make a living servicing. oops, is that the wrong word, sorry, officiating, we know where that is going.

It must be killing for all of you to continue so contrite and meek for the time being. Man youse gonna gayabrate yourselves senseless when you reset the calender to gay day O.

[_harmony]

What's another abomination or two in this world anyways?

Amazing how it's always someone else's abomination.

[_Nightlion]

What's another abomination or two in this world anyways?

Amazing how it's always someone else's abomination.

My dear Harmony. This entire world is an abomination. If you need proof just chime into a Youtube of stand up comedy where the pride of the world is celebrated. Nobody chuckles more heartily than the girlies. The raunchy comic is a gang molester who makes vile sacrament on the alter of human amusement to ceremoniously fiddle with and defile people en masse. And the women wipe their mouths having laughed up a froth and say to themselves that they have done no iniquity.

This studied molestation en masse was taken from Religious revival templates and perverted. It is the new orgie by orgasmatist (comedians) who preach the contemporary dogmas that people relish most.

Every thing that is not subject to God is abomination. Just keeping it real.

[_harmony]

Every thing that is not subject to God is abomination. Just keeping it real.

But every thing is subject to God. Thus there are no abominations, except those created by men (ETA)... you know... greed, pride, gluttony, envy, that sort of thing. But then.. man taints everything.

[_Nightlion]

Every thing that is not subject to God is abomination. Just keeping it real.

But every thing is subject to God. Thus there are no abominations, except those created by men (ETA)... you know... greed, pride, gluttony, envy, that sort of thing. But then.. man taints everything.

Heavenly days, harmony, you have an obtuse way of agreeing with a body.

[_harmony]

But every thing is subject to God. Thus there are no abominations, except those created by men (ETA)... you know... greed, pride, gluttony, envy, that sort of thing. But then.. man taints everything.

Heavenly days, harmony, you have an obtuse way of agreeing with a body.

Heavenly and harmony...

[_Nightlion]

Heavenly and harmony...

Can be sung to: Ebony and Ivory http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnMyykVLgKs by Paul McCartney

[_Daniel2]

Hmmm... I posted another graphic over on MDD, and it got the threat closed, the moderator claiming that the board isn't "political" (after six pages of discussion on the topic. Go figure). This time, I admit: I'm a bit more surprised, given that I didn't think what I posted this time was even remotely inflammatory:

The post I was replying to:

zerinus, on 13 March 2012 - 12:45 PM, said:

Agreed. At first "civil partnerships" were proposed, to avoid calling it marriage. Now it is a full blown marriage. What if in ten years time somebody decided that they wanted to marry their dog, or cat, or the trees in their garden? What would be the logical basis of stopping it? There wouldn't be; and eventually the concept of marriage would become meaningless. It is a plot by the devil to destroy the institution of marriage.

My response:

I found that the following explanation provides a pretty succinct answer to your concerns:




Ares' response:

Posted 7 minutes ago

This is Ares and this is a Mormoism board.

The two are in an intimate partnership to kill any thread that goes purely political.

At least he/she was attempting to be play-on humorous. I have a sneaking suspicion that the graphic was simply too irrefutable.

[_Buffalo]

At least he/she was attempting to be play-on humorous. I have a sneaking suspicion that the graphic was simply too irrefutable.

The timing of thread closures often conveniently follows a particularly good point from a critical viewpoint. I suspect this isn't coincidence.