Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Mary
_Emeritus
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:45 pm

Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _Mary »

Can anyone point me to the best arguments/evidence that suggest that Joseph Smith never committed adultery and never had sexual relationships with any of his plural or polyandrous wives.

Thanks.
"It's a little like the Confederate Constitution guaranteeing the freedom to own slaves. Irony doesn't exist for bigots or fanatics." Maksutov
_Tobin
_Emeritus
Posts: 8417
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:01 pm

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _Tobin »

Um, why are you asking the forum about this? Joseph Smith was a polygamist and had relations with his polygamist wives. Maybe you want to talk to the RLDS about this instead since I think they are in denial about it.
"You lack vision, but I see a place where people get on and off the freeway. On and off, off and on all day, all night.... Tire salons, automobile dealerships and wonderful, wonderful billboards reaching as far as the eye can see. My God, it'll be beautiful." -- Judge Doom
_Mary
_Emeritus
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _Mary »

Tobin wrote:Um, why are you asking the forum about this? Joseph Smith was a polygamist and had relations with his polygamist wives. Maybe you want to talk to the RLDS about this instead since I think they are in denial about it.


Yeah, maybe it isn't such a good idea, but it came up on another site from an active LDS member not RLDS, who quoted the Price book on 'Joseph Smith fought polygamy' and was arguing that they had actually made quite a strong case.

I hasten to say that I have never read the Price book.

Tobin, I don't have any argument that Joseph was a polygamist, but since there appears to be no children from any of his polygamous or polyandrous relationships, or even from the supposed affairs with Fanny Alger and others (see the latest Grant Palmer podcast with John Dehlin on this), I'm wondering what the best evidence is that the marriages were purely dynastic.

I'm well aware of the 'horny old Joe' argument and the evidence for it. What's the evidence against it.

Perhaps I didn't frame my question well enough.

Apologies.
"It's a little like the Confederate Constitution guaranteeing the freedom to own slaves. Irony doesn't exist for bigots or fanatics." Maksutov
_Drifting
_Emeritus
Posts: 7306
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 10:52 am

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _Drifting »

Mary,

If Joseph practiced polygamy without having sex he was in breach of what God wanted him to do. Polygamy was instituted by God for the specific purpose of 'raising seed'. In other words, having children.
To be compliant with Gods will Joseph would have at least attempted to sire offspring with his polygamous wives, even those who already had living husbands.

The apologists can't win this.

If Joseph didn't have sex he wasn't horny but disobeyed a direct commandment from God.

If Joseph did have sex then he didn't father any children. Why would God command Joseph to raise seed and then bless him only with 'blank' ammunition?
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator
_Tobin
_Emeritus
Posts: 8417
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 6:01 pm

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _Tobin »

Mary wrote:Yeah, maybe it isn't such a good idea, but it came up on another site from an active LDS member not RLDS, who quoted the Price book on 'Joseph Smith fought polygamy' and was arguing that they had actually made quite a strong case.
There are LDS members that don't know very much about the history of the Church.
Mary wrote:Tobin, I don't have any argument that Joseph was a polygamist, but since there appears to be no children from any of his polygamous or polyandrous relationships, or even from the supposed affairs with Fanny Alger and others (see the latest Grant Palmer podcast with John Dehlin on this), I'm wondering what the best evidence is that the marriages were purely dynastic.
I'm well aware of the 'horny old Joe' argument and the evidence for it. What's the evidence against it.
Perhaps I didn't frame my question well enough.
Apologies.
Joseph had polygamous relations. I really don't know anyone that has studied the issue can deny that (well, other than RLDS). I don't think any off-spring from these relations survived. Unfortunately, it was a difficult time to live and many babies and young children did not survive.

The polyandrous charge is just garbage however. Mormons believe they need to be sealed (married by God for eternity, typically in the temple) to go to heaven. A number of women, who happened to be married to other men, were sealed/married to the prophet during his lifetime. They never had relations with him and remained with their husbands while Joseph Smith was alive. I am not aware of any credible evidence otherwise, so like I said - the charge is garbage. Anyway, there was a belief at the time that if you got sealed to the prophet, you were assured to go to heaven. In fact, a large number of women were sealed to Joseph Smith after he died too because of this belief.
"You lack vision, but I see a place where people get on and off the freeway. On and off, off and on all day, all night.... Tire salons, automobile dealerships and wonderful, wonderful billboards reaching as far as the eye can see. My God, it'll be beautiful." -- Judge Doom
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _zeezrom »

I active LDS members could change one historical fact, it would be Joseph's sexual relationships.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _zeezrom »

by the way Mary, you asked about the portrayal of Joseph Smith.

Which one are you referring to?
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_just me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9070
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:46 pm

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _just me »

Have you read "Joseph Fought Polygamy?"

That is the best one you'll find, I think. It is available online through The Red Brick Store website.

Link: http://restorationbookstore.org/jsfp-index.htm
~Those who benefit from the status quo always attribute inequities to the choices of the underdog.~Ann Crittenden
~The Goddess is not separate from the world-She is the world and all things in it.~
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Mary,

You can't really prove that something didn't happen. The most you can do is raise doubt that it took place. From an outsider's position, I think the strongest case against Joseph Smith engaging in sexual relations with his wives is the lack of offspring from those unions.

Do I believe it proves that Joseph didn't have sex with his wives?

Oh, heck no.

I'm just saying it's the strongest piece of the defense that apologists have going for them at this time.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: Is the portrayal of Joseph Smith fair?

Post by _harmony »

Tobin wrote: A number of women, who happened to be married to other men, were sealed/married to the prophet during his lifetime. They never had relations with him and remained with their husbands while Joseph Smith was alive.


Heaven forbid we should believe the women.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
Post Reply